2006-07-20 00:39:29 · 7 answers · asked by Jessica 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Not a chance. He is really that dumb. Must go down as the dumbest president of all time. No stem cell research, no Kyoto, no immigrants(Mexicans anyway), would make a great movie title. The Bush Presidency- Clueless in Seattle, Miami, New York, etc. He is an embarrassment to all intelligent Americans but as long as he continues to quote the Bible, will continue to treat you all as 2 year olds who know nothing. Really watch him in his press conferences, it is like he is talking to a child and scolding all who question his wisdom. A sleeper cell to Bush is where drunks go to sleep a bender off.Or any cell in his brain.
2006-07-20 00:50:56 · answer #1 · answered by Bob D 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You better believe it. One thing the President does is RULE! He doesn't wait till the polls come out to make decisions. Stem Cell research comes through the destruction of potential life. The other hope for the destruction of life already here.
You cannot really believe that he doesn't know the difference. But, I must tell you, the question was funny. I love it when people say ugly things about the President because then we know whether we can take you seriously. Are you trying to be "THE LAST COMIC STANDING?" Just wondering.
2006-07-20 01:05:58 · answer #2 · answered by oph_chad 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I do, and I think this is a silly question. President Bush has stated clearly from day one that if congress passed this particular piece of legislation he would veto it. Weren't you paying attention??? It's wonderful to have a president that protects life!!
2006-07-20 00:51:46 · answer #3 · answered by rosi l 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
harvesting sleeper cells results in the destruction of a life that was, after all, only sleeping
2006-07-20 00:43:37 · answer #4 · answered by Meymun Beg 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The question is do you?
http://www.allaboutpopularissues.org/history-of-stem-cell-research-faq.htm
2006-07-20 01:10:51 · answer #5 · answered by Tommy G. 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One is a potential killer, the other a potential life saver, both lives end prematurely, but one never had a choice.
2006-07-20 00:58:38 · answer #6 · answered by askthetoughquestions 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he should
2006-07-20 00:42:28 · answer #7 · answered by piezie1 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋