2006-07-19 18:30:50 · 26 answers · asked by Ineed 1 in Social Science ➔ Sociology
ask a more civilized question
2006-07-19 18:33:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
WOW that's hard.
Is a suicide pact allowed?
I ask that because this is an impossible situation. A No Win situation. A person who demands that I kill my best friend in order to live, is a person who likely has no value for life and, therefore, cannot be trusted. Despite any guarantees, I have no real proof that after killing my friend, this person wouldn't kill me anyway. NOR do I have any substantial proof that if I chose to be shot, that this person wouldn't kill my friend anyway.
As both my best friend and I discovered, in reality, while answering a similar question as a dare, the person required to kill the friend would do so out of self-preservation, but the friend would defend himself and kill the self-preservationist out of defense. This, of course would be a total scam which may or may not fool the monster making the impossible proposition, but it would satisfy the conditions of the situation, while allowing two people who care about each other to be the ones to commit the final act.
2006-07-20 01:45:35 · answer #2 · answered by chipchinka 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on the circumstance.
If the asker was sitting there in front of me at the time, i would shoot him and then get us out.
If there was no escape for either of us any way, I would shoot my friend, and then shoot myself.
If I was guaranteed to be let out after the shooting, I would probably shoot myself.
If the bullet wouldn't cause immediate death and I would get out afterwards, then i would shoot my friend.
By the way, does this question actually have a purpose?
2006-07-20 02:18:19 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i`d be shooting my best friend who can sacrifice for me..
because shooting and killing are both two different things..
shooting doesnt mean i am going to shoot him on the head rather may be on arms or legs.. so that he wont die.. later on this can be cured.. but killing me or him is not a better option in any situation...
:)
2006-07-20 02:10:58 · answer #4 · answered by BoB-SeriouS 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I could never kill my best friend, or anyone I love for that matter. My friend would never allow me to be killed in his stead, so naturally, I'd beat up all the bad guys and save the day.
For real though, I'd die for anyone I love. Why?- I couldn't go on living knowing that I could have saved them.
2006-07-20 01:38:16 · answer #5 · answered by Juror #8 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would not shoot my friend, but do my best to escape. if i got shot i would have saved someone elses life, so that would make me feel better than being a killer for the rest of my life
2006-07-20 01:34:25 · answer #6 · answered by Milanakin:) 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Too Bad d00d.I dont have a best friend. Hey I've got an idea!! why'nt you be my best friend so that I can shoot u.muahahaha!!
2006-07-20 01:43:31 · answer #7 · answered by Nathan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would choose to die rather than shoot somebody that I loved. I could not live with myself otherwise, so the remainder of my life would be worthless, anyway.
2006-07-20 01:36:10 · answer #8 · answered by Oblivia 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what does the nw/c stand 4?
Well nvm that.
If u mean kill ur best friend . or kill ur self.
umm..i would just u no die.
Be cause friends are friends.
they would do the same 4 me
2006-07-20 01:34:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
am not sure that i can do it and shoot my best friend.. but the humane being is meant to be selfish when he is in danger ..some hormones makes his attitudes spontaneous.. that means he wont think about his actions when he is in such a position.. am not sure I never been there
2006-07-20 01:40:07 · answer #10 · answered by Nan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would rather be shot myself then kill my best friend because first of all muder is sin and i would jump in front of a bullet for anyone that i care about.
2006-07-20 01:35:50 · answer #11 · answered by Amez 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋