Think about it a little bit. For (3/4)^n, the number is getting smaller as n gets larger. Since every term is positive, there *is* a limit. I L is the limit, however, L=L*(3/4), so L=0. This works for x^n whenever 0<=x<1. Clearly 1^n=1. If x>1, then x^n gets larger as n gets larger. By the previous reasoning, if there were a limit, the limit would have to be 0. Thus, there is no limit. Thus we have:
lim x^n
= 0 if -1
=1 if x=1
is infinite if x>1
fails to exist if x<=-1.
2006-07-20 01:31:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by mathematician 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
In this case, zero. The thing you need to ask is "is the fraction more or less than 1?" If the fraction is greater than 1, the limit is infinity, if it is exactly 1, the limit is 1, and if the fraction isnonnegative and less than 1, the limit is zero.
2006-07-19 18:31:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Pascal 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
you are able to't "cancel out" infinity contained in the denominator and nominator of the fraction. Sorry. Math is a precise technological expertise. What you may do is to cancel out aspect n^100 to blame for the boom: as long as (n+30)^100 / (2 * n^100)=0.5*(n^100/n^100)* *(a million+30/n)^100 =0.5*(a million+30/n)^100 and 30/n->0 as n->infinity, then 0.5*(a million+30/n)^100 ->0.5*a million=0.5=a million/2 lim (n+30)^100 / (2 * n^100)=a million/2.
2016-11-06 20:59:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
if you're raising a proper fraction to n, then the limit as n approaches infinity is 0.
if you're raising an improper fraction to n, then the limit as n approaches infinity is undefined.
2006-07-19 18:27:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by early_sol 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
in a case like this.. which one approaches infinity faster? 3^n or 4^n?... then there are rules for determining some other functions
2006-07-19 18:26:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by ♥Tom♥ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let y = the limit as x --> infinity of b^x.
ln[y] = ln[lim as x--> inf of b^x)
Since ln[x] is continuous over its domain,
ln[y] = lim as x-->inf of ln[b^x] = lim as x-->inf of xln[b]
If b is greater than or equal to 0:
If b < 1 ln[b] < 0 and lim as x-->inf of xln[b] = -inf, so y = 0.
If b = 1 ln[b] = 0 and lim as x-->inf of xln[b] = 0, so y = e^0 = 1.
If b > 1 ln[b] > 0 and lim as x-->inf of xln[b] = +inf, so y = +inf.
2006-07-19 23:21:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Damn, that limit stuff sucked. Just graph it into your calculator (if you've got a TI-82 or higher). it would be
y=(3/4)^x
I don't remember. Oh, early_sol's right.
2006-07-19 18:28:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by ucd_grad_2005 4
·
0⤊
0⤋