2006-07-19 17:32:29 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
Yes I believe in Evolution. The critical mass of evidence seems to support the idea that on of my ancestors was not a homo sapien.
2006-07-19 17:36:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
My mom is an animal,so yes my ancestors are animals. There are 2 main categories of mulitcellular life on earth - plant and animal. We are all animals. Why do people think it's such a bad thing to be so closely related to other animals? At least the rest of the species on earth don't go on mass killing rampages of eachother. I'd think it would be the other animals that would find it shameful to be so closely related to us, not the other way around.
2006-07-19 17:45:31 · answer #2 · answered by darcy_t2e 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because I have common sense.
Evolutionists theorize that life sprang from non-life early in Earth's history. This supposedly happened when a bolt of lightning struck the "prebiotic soup," the term for the oceans that evolutionists believe were teeming with chemical compounds that would eventually form the building blocks of life. However, this speculative scenario is constantly being refuted and then replaced by new ones, which in turn get shot down.
2006-07-19 17:43:22 · answer #3 · answered by S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Believe" is a strong word. I *accept* it as the most plausible scientific explanation of where I and my species came from, and the explanation that best fits the current evidence.
(It's certainly more plausible than the story that my ancestors, and the ancestors of every human on earth, are Noah and his family, as the only survivors of "The Flood" just 5,000 years ago. However, that story seems to be more consistent with "common sense" to people like 'S'! :-) )
2006-07-19 19:31:14 · answer #4 · answered by secretsauce 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, its just a theory besides we are not from monkeys we are made from the image of God, something that charles darwin didn't know about besides there is not enough evidence to support the evolution theory there is still some missing links, but on the Biblical side everything has been clearly written down
2006-07-19 19:58:01 · answer #5 · answered by Cirno 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We are still animals!! and yes I believe we have common ancestors with other animals.
2006-07-19 23:18:37 · answer #6 · answered by Kelly + Eternal Universal Energy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I do...
What we consider to be modern man ( Homo Sapiens )
developed ( evolved ) about 225,000 years ago..
The farther back you go, the less we resemble modern man.
Go back a few million years and you would not even recognize us.
Go back a few a few tens of millions of years and we get unrecognizable as even the human ancestors..
Like animals.............Which I believe is your question..
2006-07-19 18:19:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Regardless of what outer "cover" humankind may have worn in the beginnings of his/her appearance on this planet, he/she was always essentially human. Regardless of what you might think, man has always been and is today, physically an animal, but one with very special properties that no other animal on this world shares.
2006-07-19 17:44:30 · answer #8 · answered by Seikilos 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, yeah. I mean there is evidence to support it and it makes sense. We are all animals.
2006-07-19 17:39:03 · answer #9 · answered by killerbutterfly87 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably.
2006-07-19 17:35:19 · answer #10 · answered by i luv teh fishes 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋