2006-07-19 17:20:05 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Yeah RJ, Where is he now?
2006-07-19 17:25:35 · update #1
Yup Clinton was a great president, let's examine.
1. the bombing of the world trade center, the USS Cole, the Kobar towers.
2. He never started a war or deployed troops except for Haiti, Bosnia, Somalia.
3. He didn't give the nuclear material that North Korea has turned into nuclear weapons and is threatening with us either.
4.He didn't start the eschelon program that violated far more civil rights than wire tapping suspected terrorist either.
5.He also didn't sell secrets to the Chinese in exchange for missile technologies either.
Yup that is the measure of a great Pres, thanks for opening my eyes.
Before your libs start, Bush isn't perfect either, but neither was Clinton. As soon as we start looking at people and not parties and propaganda we might get something done in the world. Till then keep arguing it will accomplish alot.
2006-07-19 20:05:09 · answer #1 · answered by RANDALL S 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Let's see....Bill Clinton got a little action outside his marriage. That's between him and his wife and family. Not my concern. He wasn't screwing an international spy or holding hands with members of foreign governments in order to earn their favor... right that was Bush, take your pick which one.
By the way the Cole was attacked in October and Clinton went Lame Duck in November, less then a month. You have to be at least a little realistic.
2006-07-20 00:35:18 · answer #2 · answered by dracomullet 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
President Clinton was a good president. He didn't start wars and he didn't mess up our economy like Bush has. He must have been the only President we've ever had that when in power, our nation was relativly stable. Most of the attention was on his personal life.
2006-07-20 00:27:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whats even funnier is that a recent Gallop poll taken says that if Clinton were able to run again for president agains Dubya, he would get over 60% of the popular vote.
2006-07-20 00:40:27 · answer #4 · answered by johngrobmyer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
But that is so much worse than starting a senseless war, and wrecking an economy, and taking away Americn civil rights and slowly turning the country into a fascist dictatorship. Oral sex with someone besides yer wife is a sin. And I am goin to hell
2006-07-20 00:49:55 · answer #5 · answered by JoeThatUKnow 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton made some mistakes... but overall, he did a good job...
why do the same people that complain about Clinton not catching Osama in one post... seem to be the same people that say Osama's no longer a threat in other posts?
That's the same attitude that Clinton had that got us in trouble the first time and now you guys have it again...hahaha... don't complain if you're going to do the same thing...
Bush said he didn't "care where Osama" is... after he killed 3,000? Clinton said it after he killed 30?
2006-07-20 00:33:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO THAT'S NOT THE WORST THING CLINTON DID, HE COULD HAVE TOOK DOWN BIN LIDEN AND HAD THE BEST CHANCE EVER TO DO IT AND HE WOULDN'T, HE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT THE SHIP BEING BOMBED, HE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT ONE OF THE TOWERS THAT IS NOW IN A FIELD SOME WERE AS RUBBLE,IT WAS ATTRACTED ON HIS WATCH AND HE WAS WATCHING MONACA, AND THERE'S ALOT MORE HE DID, OH YEA THE NAFTA BILL WHO FIRST SIGNED THAT IN TO FORCE AND STARTED ALL OUR JOBS GOING OVER SEAS, HE LET BUSH A BIG FAT MESS, AND HE'S BEEN CLEANING IT UP EVER SINCE
2006-07-20 00:30:26 · answer #7 · answered by purpleaura1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For all Clinton's faults, he was a damn good president. So what if he wanted a little head while he was head. If I could have him back as pres, I would, since I know he cares enough to clean up this mess we're in.
2006-07-20 00:24:38 · answer #8 · answered by Prytanic_Kitra 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes sir.... Actually, no one could find anything wrong in his work as the President... So of course some nice minded people had to spy on him to find his personal likings... In fact, per law, even the presient is in title of having a private... He could have sued other parties in this whole story even if true...He was a very nice and internationaly peace minded president... Young enough to care about life too... They had to set him up to get rid of him obviously... So, who cares who he slept with...
We, Canadians were very fond of him... and did not care if he
would have been GAY for that matter......
GET HIM BACK as soon as possible....all you americans...
2006-07-20 00:45:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It endeared him showed his human side.
I am sure presidents and prime ministers of other countries have done the same thing at some time .
Made me wonder if it may have been a set up!
2006-07-20 00:28:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋