English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-19 16:48:58 · 21 answers · asked by LedZeppelin4ever1955 3 in Sports Basketball

21 answers

1996 Chicago Bulls because Kobe and Shaq will complain like always and MJ will score 40-50 points per game

2006-07-19 16:53:47 · answer #1 · answered by ... 4 · 1 1

Easily the Lakers, cause the Bulls are now way to old to compete against the younger Lakers: nearly all ´96 Bulls have retired but you have now Kobe in his prime and also shaq is not that bad. Lakers 4 - Bulls 0.

2006-07-19 22:30:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Michael Jordan Bulls would easily win against the Lakers.

2006-07-19 20:57:08 · answer #3 · answered by cdbryant73 1 · 0 0

I think the '01 Lakers would pull it out in six or seven games.

The problem for the Bulls would be they have no one that could match up with Shaq. He would absolutely score at will against this team. Luc Longley would be in foul trouble by halftime in every game!

Jordan would get his 40 points a game, but that would be it for them. The only reason I would say it would go seven games is because eventually Kukoc and Pippen would get hot for one or two games, but that would be it. Rodman would be ejected in at least a couple games, due to the frustration of getting out-rebounded by Shaq.

Yes, Chicago won 72 games that year. But keep in mind that the league expanded that year to the current 29 teams, diluting the talent pool. That Bulls team wouldn't have come close to winning that many games in say, the 1980"s.

I think in this matchup, the '01 Lakers are just too strong up front for the '96 Bulls.

2006-07-19 18:21:41 · answer #4 · answered by Hoopfan 6 · 0 0

The Bulls because they were a more well balanced team all around than the Lakers were in 2001.

2006-07-19 17:27:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bulls

2006-07-19 16:52:39 · answer #6 · answered by sdchaldo27 3 · 0 0

The 1996 Bulls may do very undesirable issues to the 2001 Lakers. The 2001 Lakers may all sit down interior the bathe attempting to bathe off the dirt from that journey. (i wanted to get extra specific, yet i comprehend for a actuality i'd get a contravention be conscious.) there's a reason Phil received extra Championships with the Bulls, that is call Jordan.

2016-10-14 23:47:13 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Who will win? What is this an upcoming game? Hypothetically speaking, now. Chicago was a better team, but they cannot match up with LA. No one could defend Shaq. And Kobe and MJ (although Jordan is better) would pretty much cancel each other out.

I would give the win to whoever has homecourt advantage, and since LA had 67 wins and Chicago had 72, I have to say, Bulls in 7 games.

2006-07-19 22:24:22 · answer #8 · answered by georgeh1981 3 · 0 0

Hey how can that be?

Both team had the same coach on their Years..

96 Bulls had Phil Jackson same as 01 Lakers.

But without a coach, If you ask who will win, Simply I think the Lakers, because in 01 Kobe was closer to MJ's game, I mean MJ was still better.. but do the bulls have shaq? Shaq couldn't be stop on 01..

So I think LAKERS would school the BULLS..

2006-07-19 16:56:39 · answer #9 · answered by emac4lyf 4 · 0 0

The 96 Bulls. They had a good team. The 01 Lakers had some good athletes.

2006-07-19 16:52:35 · answer #10 · answered by Mariposa 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers