Men would win by using dirty tactics, telling the women they gained weight, or getting them to fight amongst themselves by telling them you slept with the other one, or my favorite make them leave by comparing them to your mother. If that doesn't work cancel all the soap operas.
2006-07-19 20:01:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by King Midas 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The answer clearly lies in the past and current history of humankind. Men have waged war against each other since the caveman days, and have become highly skilled at this aggression. They are the ones who fashioned weapons and hunted prey millenniums ago.
Way back then women were often pregnant and had children to care for and primarily were concerned with domestic duties.
To get to the point of this theoretical question, it's highly likely that men would be the victors, however it's women who primarily raise men and most are wise enough to educate men in the proper way to respect and treasure women so hopefully your scenario never sees fruition.
2006-07-19 23:53:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by sunshine25 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Women. In a battle situation men are filled with their testerone and may act hastily--like rushing the enemy's hill when he's fully exposed to a rain of bullets. Men might call other men who do this heroes, but women just call it stupid. By nature women are patient. They can calmly plan out an attack and wait for the right moment to implement it. Women are more likely to see all sides of a problem and come up with more solutions.
It's a known fact that women are more ruthless. I've read where law enforcement/military recognize that in a terrorist situation, the woman is less likely to give up or abandon her mission. She'll fight to the death for her principles.
2006-07-19 23:39:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by goldie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
We would both lose, not just because we might ultimately all die out, but because we'd lose each other's friendship.
As far as actual fighting, men would assuredly win if they (we) really wanted to, because men are (on average) physically stronger, more experienced with weapons, and capable of greater violence and brutality. An actual war between the sexes would be as horrible as it would be short, leading to total "victory" for men and total subjugation of the surviving women.
It wouldn't be much of a victory, because as ugly as the world is now, the world in and after such a war would be far uglier. It's neither a world nor a war that I (for one) would want to be any part of.
2006-07-19 23:40:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by devyn_d 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I am going to say it would be close.
The men will fight so much amongst themselves and kill off half of their own army, giving the women more of a chance.
The women will talk about each other behind their backs and break down their army until nobody is speaking to anybody else. Giving the men a better chance.
2006-07-20 00:18:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by curls 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
The women, because the men would be so busy sitting back waiting for the women to do it all.
2006-07-19 23:34:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rachel B 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Although I want to agree with sean O, the first answerer I would have to say the ladies would take it 3% and all.
2006-07-20 00:21:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by igɳo★ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Never underestimate the power of a woman. We'd win because behind every good man there is a woman.....we'd trick you and have you fighting yourselves in the end while we sat back laughing.....teehee.....I'm really not that much of a libber.
2006-07-19 23:39:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sonie 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Sorry to say the women would win...All we'd have to do is flash so boob and they would be to distracted by the sex they were not getting to fight.
2006-07-20 00:20:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by ... 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
men because there stronger and women only use 3%of there brain its science
2006-07-19 23:33:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by sean O 2
·
1⤊
0⤋