bush is against killing embryos but he's for killing iraqi civilians. Does that make sense?

Answer 1

Right... he has a moral problem with doing research which could benefit all mankind, but he has no problem with sending our boys off to kill and die... it doesn't make a bit of sense to me. If you voted for him, slap yourself.

Answer 2

You are talking about the difference between apples and oranges here. Bush is against killing embryos with only the potential to become human beings when to sole purpose is strictly experimental. Bush is not in favor of killing innocent Iraqi civilians, but believes the U.S must do what is necessary to establish democracy in the Middle East.

Answer 3

Yes. If you're Bush it makes perfect sense. Embryos are potentially people. Iraqis, on the other hand, are foreigners.

Also, at some point the Iraqi male adults might have had a chance to get rich somehow, so any of them that were worth a damn and had a lick of sense would have gotten out of there already--like Katrina in the U.S. I'm sure a common phrase used by Bush and Co. is "The Lord helps those who help themselves." Bush, Cheney, and their chief campaign contributors have never once hesitated to help themselves. That's why God loves them so much.

Like I said, if you're Bush or someone like him it makes perfect sense. I'm pretty sure that he and his supporters would probably agree with all this.

Answer 4

Embryos didn't choose to become life. Iraqi civilians that are killed CHOSE where they wanted to live. It's more the bad guys killing them and pointing the finger at the US because they know our media is out to destroy our country and our way of life.

Answer 5

If you believe Bush is "for killing iraqi civilians" I think it's about time you started reading newspapers instead of just the comics page.

Answer 6

Apples & oranges! During war there are always civilian deaths.
This could have been avoided had they not invited terrorist to
have safe haven in their country.They can leave the country too.

Embryos are future children who have no protection or choices.
That we were going to destroy them anyways arguement does not hold water. There are always researchers trying to cut corners & beat others on break throughs. We do not allow assisted sucide & we do not allow the killing of embryos.

Answer 7

It's goes to show that the term "pro-life" is a misnomer. Yeah Bush and all the neo-cons are so pro-life, supporting the killing of millions of civilians in post-WWII conflicts, supporting the death penalty, opposing condoms to stop the spread of AIDS, cutting social services to help the poor. I guess "pro-life" ends when you are born and only counts if you're American.

"Pro-life" Definition: Building a family planning clinic in a
developing country is wrong. Blowing up
homes filled with families is fine.

Answer 8

Not rational.
Seems to be against killing embryos,but at the same time never seem to be worried about dying souls allover in the Middle east.

Answer 9

You have to look at it from the right point of view.

He doesn't give a **** about embryos or Iraqi's.
He gives a **** about votes.

Now does it make sense?

Answer 10

Its called war. Did anyone complain when we fire bombed Dresden during ww2. 28 million soviet citizens were murdered during Stalin's rule. Why do you think they are ruled by dictators in the middle east, because you cant ask them nicely. That's the only thing the radical Islamic groups know is kill kill kill westerners that's why they have to be dealt with in a hard military like way.