The WHITE HOUSE and DOD said the WMDs that were found aren't the ones they went to war over... yet they are still talking about them... CONSTANTLY it seems?
why won't they even listen to their own administration?
and the Clinton could've caught Osama thing? It was like one guy from the Sudan or something that said it.. that's all they have for evidence and they waive it around like it's in the bible... even though many other sources have denied it (9-11 report)?
and the Iraq links to 9-11? Every middle eastern country has some links, but Iraq has about the least of them all... yet I constantly hear on here that they are linked?
it's like truth has no place for them?
DISCLAIMER: I know all Republicans are doing this and many are up on the issues and know what is going on... I'm not talking about you... and I also know many liberals are saying a bunch of stupid stuff too, like the goverment did 9-11... and that frustrates me too...
2006-07-19 15:46:52 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
correction to disclaimer: should be "are not doing this"
2006-07-19 15:47:31 · update #1
THIS HAS ALL BEEN IN THE NEWS... MUCH OF IT HAS BEEN A LOT...
READ THE 9-11 REPORT FOR IRAQI LINKS (OR LACK THERE OF)
2006-07-19 15:55:57 · update #2
See Rabbit is exactly what I'm talking about... some terrorists run to Iraq... that's nice a vague... the first WTC bombing? is that what you're talking about?
But, oh, there are TONS of links to Saudi Arabia... finances, millions and millions and the majority of the hijackers were from sauidi (9-11 Report)... there are many camps in the Sudan and Somalia with tons of terrorists in them ...
but a couple of terrorists fleed there at some point?... well that's super strong evidence that there was a clear Osama/Saddam link... guh...
2006-07-19 16:03:00 · update #3
jpxc99: nice unbais web site... hahaha... I could post some liberal bias web site, but what would be the point... the truth probably exists in between...
and how old are those stats?
2006-07-19 16:05:45 · update #4
mulligan's 1... that's true... but 99 percent of the time... stuff on the internet is just that... stuff on the internet...
Conservatives who believe all this crap they see on the internet are as well informed as those who see all this "9-11" conspiracy stuff on the internet...
if you want to take your chances... go ahead, but I've seen a lot of things I know is wrong on the internet, just from what I've seen with my two eyes... they make CNN, Dan Rather and FOX News look like straight shooters
2006-07-19 16:12:15 · update #5
I agree 100%. It really is unfathomable the amount of people who use this site that seem to immediately spew forth a piece of information before doing any real research on the issue. It's like they either read or hear something, and actually believe it has to be true. I blame the opinionated cable news channels as well as the Internet when not used to its fullest potential. That is the worst part. These people are using a piece of technology that puts the world at their fingertips, but they're too lazy to actually use it for research.
2006-07-20 16:32:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Aren't you tired of the same old "sound bytes"? There is truth on both sides, and exaggerations! WMD's: Found!..Whats the problem? Clinton/ Sudan: Multiple sources confirmed! What's the problem? Iraqi/ 911 connection? No direct evidence (seems to be retaliation to me) Whats the problem? If you pay attention to more than one source, because they all have their bias, you can glean the truth.
2006-07-19 23:25:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They just found their pipelines in a mess, and allowed the real problems to go to the way side like North Korea. I am still sure the North Korean million man military had a lot to do with that decision though. America has been monitoring them for 50 years now.
2006-07-21 03:15:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The truth is out there.
Strange, when some terrorists were almost nabbed, they fled to Iraq.
I think, 50 years from now, most of the stories will be sorted out, like with the Nazis and Japanese (who worked on an atomic bomb too).
Both sides are exaggerating and we want our side to be the one that isn't--as you noted "I also know many liberals are saying a bunch of stupid stuff"--to which I heartily agree.
2006-07-19 22:55:29 · answer #4 · answered by Rabbit 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can handle the truth but you have to bring the truth first.
News Flash!!! Everything the media says is not true.
Secret information gathered by hundreds of sources our government & others governments trump what CNN, the Communist News Network, & liberal lawmakers have to say.
Truth is a relative term - my truth may not be your truth. We may all be dead before we find out which truth is right. Saying it louder does not make it so.
2006-07-19 23:06:29 · answer #5 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, Republicans can handle the truth. When you bring me some truth and not some fabricated ranting of a lunatic or a Parrot squawking out the same old tired lies.
2006-07-19 22:52:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure. The truth shall set me free (and assist in tying Libs in mental knots).
2006-07-19 22:58:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
So, what sources do you have for what you just said? Such as that there are no links, or few. What is the question?
2006-07-19 22:51:43 · answer #8 · answered by Kiko 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know can you handle the truth?
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/BG1086.cfm
2006-07-19 22:58:01 · answer #9 · answered by jpxc99 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some can , some can't
2006-07-19 22:55:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋