Depends what your conviction was for, but in general I would say, no, if it was a felony. You would have to look at the paperwork yourself.
2006-07-19 14:18:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No actually, the only person to thank is you. You are the one who has a criminal record. No offense to you. I believe everyone is entitled to mistakes. Now for your question, this would also depend on your offense. If it's a felony, then I would imagine that you cannot own ANY kind of firearm. If you're on probation, then you'll need to ask your probation officer this question, or even ask your attorney. Just make sure you don't have any kind of firearm in your possession until you find out exactly what you can or can't have. Possession of a firearm could lead you back into jail again, with an addendum to your criminal record. Maybe in the future, you can get a pardon or the equivalent to one. Best of luck to you....
2006-07-19 14:22:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by cajunrescuemedic 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually you can't blame Pres. Clinton, it is the Brady Bill. That said you have broken the laws of the land, and the only way you can get a gun is to buy it off an individual.
2006-07-19 14:34:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by David 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on the state. Each state has its own laws about felony gun disenfranchisement (so Bill Clinton had nothing to do with it). Many allow shotguns for hunting and many also have a restoration process where you can regain your right to own a gun. I could get you more information with the state you are in.
2006-07-19 15:58:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by James 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
So go to a legal gun dealer and find out what you are legally allowed to buy. Quit blaming Clinton for your own criminal record.
2006-07-19 14:18:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Diane D 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't do the crime if you can't handle the time. A criminal record tends to follow a person for a LONG time maybe yah should have thought about that Before the crime rather than after the fact.
2006-07-19 14:23:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You actually have John Hinkley Jr to thank because he was the one started this chain of events and thus the Brady Act was enacted. Hinkley attempted to assasinate Reagan, but shot his assistant, James Brady.
Purchases from a non-FFL are not subject to the Brady Law but may be covered under other federal, state (usually) and local (rarely) restrictions. This distinction prevails without regard to the locus of the sale. Thus FFL sales at gun shows are still subject to NICS approval while private sales are not. The so-called "Gun Show Loophole" would be more accurately called a "Private Sale Loophole."
The Brady Law does not apply to licensed Curios & Relics (C&R) collectors but only in respect to C&R firearms [1]. The FFL Category 03 Curio & Relic license costs $30 and is valid for 3 years. Licensed C&R collectors may also purchase C&R firearms from private individuals or from federal firearms dealers, whether in their home state or in another state and ship C&R firearms in interstate commerce by common carrier. Curios or relics are defined in 27 CFR 478.11 as "Firearms which are of special interest to collectors by reason of some quality other than is associated with firearms intended for sporting use or as offensive or defensive weapons." The regulation further states "To be recognized as curios or relics, firearms must fall within one of the following categories:
(a) Firearms which were manufactured at least 50 years prior to the current date, but not including replicas thereof;
(b) Firearms which are certified by the curator of a municipal, State, or Federal museum which exhibits firearms to be curios or relics of museum interest; and
(c) Any other firearms which derive a substantial part of their monetary value from the fact that they are novel, rare, bizarre, or because of their association with some historical figure, period, or event. Proof of qualification of a particular firearm under this category may be established by evidence of present value and evidence that like firearms are not available except as collector's items, or that the value of like firearms available in ordinary commercial channels is substantially less."
2006-07-19 14:29:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by mabelle907 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually your own breaking the law is to thanks for that one. I for one am happy that individuals with criminal records cannot buy hand guns. Same reason they take drunk driver's lisences away... good chance it will happen again.
2006-07-19 14:19:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Darius 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
only because of the fact they blocked sixty 9,000 sales (a component i'm going to offer you for the sake of academic argument) does not recommend those strikes have been justified. errors are made, you understand? and how lots of those meant legal convictions have been for gun crimes? i'm going to wager maximum have been for minor issues (like a fistfight mutually as on shore depart whilst they have been interior the protection stress) and the adult men did no longer additionally understand they have been convicted felons till the state kicked back their apps! enable's face it, in the event that they KNEW they have been felons, why could they even concern to prepare? And enable's extra beneficial think (for the sake of academic argument) that all and sundry sixty 9,000 have been to blame as sin. how lots of them went to the black industry and effectively carried out their undertaking? yet of direction, the government does not song THAT! So, you notice, there is no thank you to tell for useful if background checks somewhat artwork, or in the event that they only postpone the inevitable. you want to hearken to a private tale approximately this sh*t? I stay in Illinois, the place we've background checks. The equipment as quickly as "in the back of schedule approval" whilst i had to purchase a .38 revolver (in all possibility because of the fact i could offered a .22 the week before -- which replace into authorized suitable away). yet get this. on the comparable time i replace into paying for a short barreled shotgun, and the equipment authorized it suitable away. the owner of the gun shop concept that one replace right into a actual hoot! "they gained't approve your pistol till later," he laughed, "yet they authorized you suitable away for a sawed off shotgun!" i won't be able to think of of a extra desirable occasion of the utter futility of gun administration regulations, to no longer point out the potential of our bumbling forms to guard us.
2016-11-02 09:15:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why don't you just steal one. That's how all the other criminals get their guns.
2006-07-19 14:23:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by C B 6
·
0⤊
0⤋