the destruction of the Twin tower
2006-07-19 13:33:02 · 13 answers · asked by .cindy 1 in Education & Reference ➔ Trivia
Actually, the "prediction" that's most often sent around in e-mails wasn't actually from Nostradamus. It was actually from an article someone wrote ABOUT Nostradamus, talking about how easy it was to make up general sounding predictions that mean so little that they can be applied to just about anything.
The person writing the article gave the quoted prediction as his example.
(Something about twins burning at 45 or something).
2006-07-19 13:38:14 · answer #1 · answered by Liam 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
all of his verses are cryptic. as in most bibles. you can pick out any verse and try ad make it fit the circumstances.
also if he was able to see into the future he didn't have the words to describe what he saw in the language of the time.
2006-07-19 20:42:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He didn't. That's a myth. All of his predictions are entirely subject to interpretation.
2006-07-19 20:36:21 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. Anonymous 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bin Ladin dropped in for a visit in his time machine.
2006-07-19 21:09:44 · answer #4 · answered by ROBERT M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He didn't. Some people nowadays simply read into his ambiguous writings things that he didn't put there.
2006-07-19 21:03:28 · answer #5 · answered by Mark V 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think he kept his "predictions" extremely vague so that it would be easy to apply his "predictions" to catastrophic world events. i've personally heard enough of his crap.
2006-07-19 21:03:51 · answer #6 · answered by geniusH 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did you also realized that "gullible" is also not in the dictionary?
2006-07-19 20:35:50 · answer #7 · answered by trafficer21 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he predicted it? I never knew!
2006-07-19 20:35:12 · answer #8 · answered by hellokid 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
by being so abstract in EVERYTHING he wrote that ANYTHING could fit one of his stansas sooner or later.
2006-07-19 22:53:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He didn't. That story was fabricated.
2006-07-19 20:36:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋