Bush vetoes bill- he says it "crosses a moral boundary".?

Question

The bill concerns legislation easing the limits on federal funding for stem cell research. Now I'm not saying that I'm pro or con, it's just that I'm tired of "King George" deciding what is morally appropriate and what isn't for the entire population of the United State, and in particular ME. Anybody else have an opinion about Bush telling them what is "morally correct".

C. R. You obviously can't read you dumb a ss. As far as the "fag" comment, I'll bet you know all about gay sex (from your own experiences). GET A LIFE IDIOT.

Answer 1

It is always the people who say they are doing things for a high moral purpose that you have to watch out for the most. For Bush to veto this bill is actually highly immoral. He is saying he would rather these embryos be destroyed than used for research that could cure disease and end the suffering of millions of people. Because it is important to remember that the only thing this bill would have done would have been to allow the federal government to fund research on embryos that otherwise were slated for destruction.

Answer 2

there's a huge distinction between embryonic stem cellular analyze and man or woman stem cellular analyze. He money man or woman SCR and vetoed ESCR. this isn't because he's pandering to the right as some recommend. that is an trouble-free shown actuality that A) it is his moral conviction, and B) in each of the years that ESCR has been researched, it has yielded no help for sickness in any way, even as on the different hand, ASCR has provided treatments to 88 diverse ailments. So why even as ASCR is so promising are we nonetheless eager to throw tax funds after some thing that would not artwork?? Why no longer throw those tax funds to at least some thing that has been shown to be positive. next, Bush's veto does no longer recommend that ESCR isn't funded, that is only not funded with tax funds. It nonetheless receives 1000's of 1000's of thousands of greenbacks a year from deepest money along with businesses and under no circumstances-for-earnings. Even that stated, there has been no promising advances -- only defeats -- in ESCR.

Answer 3

this man has great morals....hahahaha yeah right.
Mr. snow said bush vetoed the bill because he does not believe in murder. how many people died in Texas while bush was governor? now you might say those people had committed horrible crimes,but how many people have been proved innocent while on death row or after they have been executed. i personally disagree with bush when life begins.but it is not my morals that are under question. i would have no problem with Mr.bush drawing a moral line in the sand as long as it was strait.

also this bill is about non implanted embryos leftover from invetro fertilization. they are going to be thrown away. they never had the chance to become a human life.
i will now try to give a moral equivalence. restaurants with buffes are only alowed to let the food sit out so long after that it may no longer be sold. some places simply throw the old yet still good food away while others donate this food to shelters for the homeless. we can throw these ebryos away or we can use them to see if we can cure heath problems

Answer 4

I really don't like Mr. W. but sometimes he does things for many important reasons. I think there needs to be more research done on how we as citizens will ensure the safety and proper use of embryonic stem cells. Also, nowadays, when something innovative is introduced to the public it is always marketed. The government definitely needs to put some restrictions and limitations on embryonic stem cell research if it does become legal.

Answer 5

Thats ok, I get tired of the onesided media deciding what we need to hear and not. Fact is umbilical cords are a far superior source for such research. They won't report it because it doesn't advance their pro-abortion agenda.
Put the blame were it belongs and you'll feel a lot better.
As for the legistlation, someone needs to stand up for those kids since the media, democtrats and moderate republicans won't.
As a rule I don't like the government making ANY moral stands and our Founders didn't want them to. Otherwise this veto doesn't bother me.

Answer 6

he says it takes innocent life.. the embryonic stem cells are not alive, they are not even visible to the human eye.

innocent life? yeah, it would be innocent life if say the embryos were actually to the point of becoming a fetus.. is it abortion if an embryo starts forming in the fallopian tubes but does not attach to the uterus therefore being rejected by the body?

bush just needs to get a good education and let someone who actually knows something about anything take over.. seriously.

Answer 7

Isn't that morality great? Thousands needlessly dead in Iraq and now he denies sick people a new hope of healing. Somehow, America has to get itself out from under the control of these Christian fundamentalists or they will kill off all science that runs against their narrow little interpretation of the Bible and turn us back to the Dark Ages, which was dark precisely because religious superstition ruled.

Answer 8

He is the president and he has veto power. This is the first time he has exercised that power. Past democrat presidents used it all the time to stop conservative legislation. Shut your whiny liberal hateful mouth. Not everybody is a liberal gay loving abortionist; actually last time I checked, you fags lost the election by a large margin.

Answer 9

I have been feeling that this is a government ran by the church. But wait a minute. Aren't we overseas helping countries establish governments that aren't dominated by any particular religion? (I know the main reason is the war on terror, and I admire our troops for their service). I thought our government was suppose to have separation of church and state and lately I haven't seen anything but the two used interchangeably.

Answer 10

I don't agree with the choice, but as president he does have the legal authority. The Constitution doesn't require him to give a good reason, and I don't think Pres. Bush has one. He heard "embryo," thought "abortion," and reached for his veto stamp. Write your congressional representatives and let them know you'd like them to override the president's veto.