9/11 still would have happend, we would have still gone to war and pissed off the UN, well Sadam would still be at large, I doubt we would have found Bin Laden, and Gas Prices would still suck. 2 points for your thoughts. Don't write a freaking book but give a good explantion.
2006-07-19 11:10:56 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Fuzzy I never said we went to war becasue of 9/11 don't mis read my Sh** and then post answers to your mistake.
2006-07-19 11:24:32 · update #1
I think you about summed it up. Except you forgot about an increase in taxes hurting the economy and no tax cuts so no way out of it. Other than that i think you hit the high points.
2006-07-19 11:13:36 · answer #1 · answered by kyle3om 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Just a guess from an outsider... I would guess Kerry would have pulled out the troops prematurely, Saddam regains power & is allowed to achieve his ambition of having a long range nuclear arsenal.
He points it at the USA & in order to prevent a nuclear war, Kerry surrenders.
Bin Laden would be found - in the VIP guest room in the White house.
Gas prices would hit an all time low because the US$ would be replaced by the Iraqi Dinar, however, you'd have no money to buy this cheap gas, because taxes would rise to 90% to fund a mosque on every street and a few more palaces for Saddam so he feels at home as he inspects his new accquisition [USA]...
2006-07-19 11:24:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We would not have gone to war in Irag, a war which had NOTHING to do with 9-11. Sadam is the one captured, not Bin Laden.
We went to war in Iraq because Bush said there were weapons of Mass Destruction there, even though the people he sent to find weapons didn't find any. It is commonly believed that we went there to 'clean up daddy's mess.'
We would have that Kyoto treaty to protect the environment, and we wouldn't have alienated the world so thouroughly that Europe and the United States would have to work on Seperate plans for the Middle East.
2006-07-19 11:19:32 · answer #3 · answered by bardoi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We would be a weaker America in the eyes of the world because Kerry would not have done anything about 9/11.
2006-07-19 11:15:25 · answer #4 · answered by Dog Mama 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
my thoughts are that Kerry would have pulled out our military, making the U.S. look weak. then he would have cut our military funds in half, making our American military weak. then he would have banned civilians the right to have weapons. The real power of America is our military might, innovation, the people, and freedom. and Kerry would have reduced America and then we would be open to attack by terrorist. Kerry would have taken the freedoms we have today and reduced them. Bush is a strong and powerful leader. he increases the funds to our military to ensure we are the most powerful in the world, to ensure that Americas citizens can be safe, and live without fear. Kerry is not fit to be President, an American President must ensure our military is the most powerful, and make sure our freedoms are not reduced. while also making the world a better place. Bush has ensured our freedom, demonstrated as a powerful leader, and ensured America remains at true world military power.
2006-07-19 11:26:11 · answer #5 · answered by cyberep 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We don't need to find Sadam, if we were after every tyrant we would be on a never ending journey. I am pretty sure Kerry would also start using OUR resourses like Clinton did to get us in surplus that way we wouldn't be paying 3 dollars a gallon
2006-07-19 11:14:06 · answer #6 · answered by song no one singz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In a way republicans are bettter war time presidents, but they just want blood money and death, they don't know when to back off, Democrats seem a bit wimpyer, but either way we are never going to free the people of the middle east. No POLITICAL PARTY IS BETTER
2006-07-19 11:18:11 · answer #7 · answered by Eve 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, many of those things occurred before Kerry ran in 04'.
He would probably blame all other negatives on his predecessor. I saw Kerry as a man who spoke to please the audience at hand and stood for nothing more than the way the wind was blowing.
Thank you Ohio.
2006-07-19 11:18:24 · answer #8 · answered by archimedes_crew 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
predicting the past is never a good thing.. there is no telling what could have or would have happened, however if we go back further to the bush/gore election, 9/11 most likely would not have happened due to the past issues bush sr. had with the middle east.
2006-07-19 11:15:31 · answer #9 · answered by Fluffington Cuddlebutts 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
9/11 would have happened..but Kerry would'nt have finished the job, like President Bush wants to do!
Bush, is a great President!
2006-07-19 11:15:32 · answer #10 · answered by ixoyechirho 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋