IS that why her husband left her?
2006-07-19 11:04:22 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I believe he left her long before their son died. As for the soapbox question, in my opinion, yes. She uses it as a soapbox and money stash to fund herself so she doesn't have to get a job. She also rides it to nice vacation spots, using it as a travel vehicle.
2006-07-19 11:11:21 · answer #1 · answered by fishing66833 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
She uses it as a soapbox no more than Bush and the Neocons use the growing mountain of caskets as some twisted justification to put more sons and daughters in harm's way for no other reason that to make money for all their buddies.
2006-07-19 11:16:28 · answer #2 · answered by PALADIN 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes and yes. He's said so many times. He also said that her son was ashamed by the way she acts. On the other hand, I don't think Cindy is all there and I think the libs are taking advantage of her and using her for their agenda. They will use anybody!
2006-07-19 11:10:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ted became a uniter if thats what he necessary so be it. he's a remarkable guy that throughout the process the time of person-friendly words necessary the best desirable for all. i'm genuinely extra beneficial for well being care now because of the actuality of his loss of life. i'm additionally an self adequate.
2016-11-02 09:02:52 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't know who she was till you mentioned her and in "Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" she sounds like a woman with a cause.
She has a point and dammit she is going to scream and shout till you all listen.
2006-07-19 11:12:09 · answer #5 · answered by Twigglet 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She lost her son in a unjust war and is simply standing up for what she believes in
2006-07-19 11:07:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes and yes. This was the democratic parties darling till they didn't need her any more.
She should be shipped to Iraq and forgotten.
2006-07-19 11:06:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
And if she is, what is wrong with that? Better that her son's death have a purpose than he be just another life lost in vain.
2006-07-19 11:21:55 · answer #8 · answered by lcraesharbor 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've decided to go with my better instincts and continue to hope none of YOUR relatives die in the neocons' proxy - oh yes, always PROXY - wars.
2006-07-19 11:16:01 · answer #9 · answered by wmp55 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wouldn't you be upset if you lost a child? Some of you people have no compassion whatsoever.
2006-07-19 11:11:06 · answer #10 · answered by ConcernedCitizen 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋