Do you think that Bush can really free the people of the middle east or is that not until jesus returns?

Question

BOOK OF REVELATIONS

and if so then why would Bush try to play god? I know the people there do very much so need our help, but it seems Bush is going about it the wrong way, and every other president we have had. Of course I don't know the right way, I am not a politician and don't have years of experience, allthough I do know I wouldn't have sold the terrorist the WMD in the first place. I wouldn't have never sold anyone a gun period.

Answer 1

Thanks for answering my previous question about those pictures I posted. Anyway, Bush is politically stupid. He came to my brother country, Iraq, in an 'excuse' to spread what he calls 'democracy'. Yes I do agree Saddam was bad (And he doesn't represent the real Muslims) But Bush is no better. He actually made things far worse. And like a parrot raises Vito against any decision by the UN against his allies, even if they were wrong. Bush made most of the world to hate America and its people, although I believe as an Arab Muslim that most Americans are also, like us, peace-loving people.
God bless good-doers in this world and curse those evil ones like this Bush and his followers.

Answer 2

The only people able to free the people in the middle east are they themselves. As long as they think hating each other is a good way of life nothing will change no matter what we do. You can not force peace on people. They really need to want peace for it to work. There are to many fanatics on both sides for that to happen soon. To many people who's entire existence relies on making sure the hate continues. What will all the extreme mullah's and radical rabbi's do when there is peace?

Hate is a powerfull thing and hard to let go.

Answer 3

President Bush cannot free the people in the Middle East , he only has two years left in office. But he has begun to do that. 90% of the world will be democracies in 75 years and the world will be so much safer.

Answer 4

You don't agree with people living in peace? President Bush is not trying to play 'god', he is fighting terrorism - you know, that radical group that killed 3000 + Americans on 9/11? The same ones that keep blowing up innocent people on trains, in cafes, all over the world, even their own people? The ones that are recruiting young children to become suicide bombers. Those fanatics have been around long, long, long before Bush took office. Is he wrong for trying to save American people's lives on their own turf? No.

Answer 5

I'm sure & sadly I don't think Mr GW Bush is going 2 save them is he?
He has close ties with Israel, wifey being half-Jew.
He'll fail 2 cut the killing because pacifying Israel seems 2 B the US aim.
Israel or Palestine?
I guess it's impossible 4 them both 2 peacefully co-exist until some1 steps in & I doubt it'll B GW!

Answer 6

IF Bombing = freedom then Bush is Definitely doing his best to free the people.
As a matter of fact, if he keeps it up there is going to be very few people left for Jesus to free.
.

Answer 7

bush is doing a nice job. if u dont think he is write him a letter urself. he is sacrifising a couple hundred lives to save millions in the whole world. i'd like to see u do better as president!

Answer 8

The only thing the pres can free is his greed and bank account from all the insane prices of gas.

Answer 9

I say that at least he's trying his best. It can't be easy being everyone's enemy, can it? but if our troops leave now, the person with the most $ and guns takes power, and we have another hitler.

Answer 10

There are no longer any actual precise concepts to discover how Jesus recognized. on a similar time as I agree that he became optimal via using no ability Caucasoid, he, and a few thing of his human beings, likely did no longer look precisely like the Mid-Easterners seen at recent, in basic terms look at many African-human beings at recent, you would be extensive wide awake that various them are plenty lighter in epidermis tone than their African cousins. As to why Jesus became/is depicted as being white (i earnings from the two tenses via way of fact many church communities are commissioning greater effective precise representations of Him) it fairly is conceivable that it did no longer come from racism. on a similar time as Jesus and Christianity have been popularized indoors the late 2d/early third centuries many conceivable believers had in no way seen a non-white, as return and forth outdoors the Roman Empire became uncommon indoors the northern factors, via way of severe concern and possibility indoors the venture. hence, many Christians in basic terms assumed that Jesus could desire to have been white, as they had in fact seen distinctive whites. yet yet one greater reason is particularly via way of racism, yet in addition via way of trouble-free human avoidance of distinctive. it may be complicated for many Christians to reconcile invading an area crammed with people who recognized corresponding to their Savior, on a similar time as countless of the crusades have been for the purpose of gaining religous factors and spreading Christianity. it does no longer could desire to be racism for somebody to be depicted as some component distinctive than as he's.