Syria is currently infilterating lebanon. They are breaking the United States and the United Nations signed treaty.
2006-07-19 10:16:20 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I think we should wait and see what Israel will do. I believe they have the power, but not the will because of the civilians that will be killed. Unfortunately, Syria and all terrorist don't care about civilians, ours or theirs. They all think with their ***** - because some Islamic Fanatical Nut Case told them if they died for Allah, that they would get 70+ Virgins in the after-life. HA! They just forgot to tell them they would all look like Janet Reno.
As far as the United Nations, they need to take a Viagra pill because they are the most impotent, spineless bunch ever to gather in one place.
2006-07-19 10:30:16 · answer #1 · answered by Dog Mama 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think people should think for themselves and not let these so called experts do the thinking for them. What would be the use. What major threat doe Syria pose? I can't see one. So they want to kill each other over there with a vengeance....what's it to us. It's not like Israel needs the help. They have their own nukes, the only party over there that has them I might add.
The worst thing that could happen is for the US to meddle in these affairs. It would most likely force even the moderate Arabs to become engaged in this conflict and I'm sure nobody wants that. Almost none of the middle east countries likes Iran so why force them together by creating a common enemy.
2006-07-19 10:48:24 · answer #2 · answered by nemesisnl1 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are too many self-proclaimed experts out there saying too many things to know for sure what's the best thing to do.
Syria and Iran are probably worth a few bombs but you can't go into something like that expecting it will just be over and done with in a few days or weeks.
If the west wants to get a grip on the violence, they probably need to display some violence of their own for an extended period of time... but, I'm no expert either.
2006-07-19 10:21:22 · answer #3 · answered by sincityq 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
first I will say it's a shame the world is in the shape thats it's in. But we will have to bomb syria and Iran soon... North Korea isnt a bad place to blow the hell out of now that I think about it. While all of the far left wings idiots dont get it, they say we shouldnt do anything, so i ask them " Do you want Those Mad Men dictators, who may be as bad if not worse than Hitler to have bombs capibale of hitting our soil?" (and yes I know that NK already has them but they arent smart enought to even get them past the sea of Japan). So yes, we have to get Syria before we regret that we didnt.
2006-07-19 10:26:03 · answer #4 · answered by full_metal_14 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think any high profile campaigns, like bombing raids, would be a good idea at this time. There are many ways to defeat an enemy, its about putting the pressure where it needs to be in the right amount.
2006-07-19 10:26:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think both Syria and Iran have to be dealt with. War is coming, sooner or later. Why wait until Iran gets nukes?
2006-07-19 10:19:30 · answer #6 · answered by jack f 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We should, and we should have done it a few days ago. It's like a massive chess game, the US is being played, they're waiting for our move.
2006-07-19 10:21:00 · answer #7 · answered by kathy059 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
x
The Chinese are the only people who can afford to lose a few
million people. so why not ask them to do the bombing?
x
2006-07-19 10:21:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think the US should get into more wars, hasn't enough money and people been wasted ?
2006-07-19 10:20:45 · answer #9 · answered by ɹɐzɔ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What experts are you talking about?
2006-07-19 10:24:07 · answer #10 · answered by ray 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋