English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

Ofcourse not, there has been enough conflicts already with Israel and the Palestians in that limited frontier. Now if they expand that into Lebanon, you can image the scale of agression and violence that will take place. Now instead of resistance only from the Palestinians, you will have struggles from Syria and Iran, and other Middle Eastern countries accumulating in further violence. Geez why can't Israel be happy with the land they have, they don't even have legitimate reasons to be there in the first place, now they are trying to conquer even more land which is rather ridiculous and greedy in all manners and so. Just because they have a strong military doesn't mean they should continually harass other people. This just reiterates my belief that military men and commanders are savages that need phyatric evaluation. And all of you guys keep stating Hezbollah is a terrorist organization, perhaps, but there must be some sort of resistance. Especially when you have a half Muslim-Christian army as in the case of the Lebanese Army, as such there is a requirement for resistance against a foreign power that invades sovereign nations under false and illegitimate pretences to occupy further land and save 2 israeli soldiers by killing and diplacing hundreds of thousands of people. As such someone has to defy a foreign power that is so jelous in the modernization of a country, that every few years they go destroy every infrastructure to keep them in check. Can't you see a pattern developing here, invasion in 1982,1996,2006, around every ten years the Israeli army looks for some false pretence upon which to invade and destroy the modernization of a country such as Lebanon in order to keep it from modernizing and possibly develop its own sovereign army in the region to justify defence. This military has not been able to develop and as such these small organizations such as Hezbollah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, however guerilla and terrorist like they seem, they are the only resistance available to a country that is not able to develop and continually bombed in mathematical periodic times(around every ten years) from developing its own sovereign military and defending itself justly.

2006-07-19 09:17:50 · answer #1 · answered by Zidane 3 · 0 2

When I was a kid, I used to play a board game called "axis and allies" with my brother. You could attack anywhere with airplanes as long as they could land, before their "fuel" ran out. One of the restrictions on air power was you could not capture territory with airplanes, had to be land forces.

During the 1991 gulf war, we bombed the occupying troops in the Kuwati desert and southern Iraq for weeks. However, eventually we invaded by land in the now famous 'hail mary' move by stormin norman.

The point of these examples is this, you cannot conquer or destroy an enemy from the air entirely. It is still necessary for grunts on the ground to eradicate the resistance. Airpower, even when overwhelming like in the gulf war and even afghanistan, cannot win a war.

The incursions have been limited, mostly by special forces designed to erradicate Hezbollah, not invade and occupy... It's the proper thing for Israel to do.

2006-07-19 15:53:52 · answer #2 · answered by trc_6111 3 · 0 0

Support it. It's time to finally start to finish this war. Afghanistan and Iraq and Lebanon are just battles in the war on terror. Some battles you win, some battles you lose, but you have to win the war for there to be peace. The war is against Islamic terrorists. We have to finish the war by destroying their ability and desire to continue the use of terrorist methods to impose their religious will upon the world. I just hope Israel doesn't back down.

2006-07-19 15:57:17 · answer #3 · answered by johngjordan 3 · 0 0

Completely against it, I wholeheartedly condemn it.

Israel should move it's frontiers to what was assigned to them in 1949, NOT an inch more.

Then if it was attack I would support Israel, BUT while it is occupying foreign land I condemn them, any and all disturbances in the region are the result of their aggression.

2006-07-19 15:58:44 · answer #4 · answered by Eli 4 · 0 0

Israel went into Lebanon in a very limited manner. They crossed the border and did what they had to do and then went back. Good for them!!!

2006-07-19 15:55:48 · answer #5 · answered by olderandwiser 4 · 0 0

As someone who understands "jewishness'' the way most people
on this site do not,I oppose the move.I'm supposed to be all for it,because of an education that state Isreal can do no wrong,but no,it should not be happening.

I love to see the nationalists blindly supporting Isreal.Dumb.

2006-07-19 16:04:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Israel's gotta do what Israel's gotta do. Maybe, just maybe they're looking for the soldiers that were kidnapped, which started this whole thing in the first place.

2006-07-19 15:49:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I support Israel unleashing the full might of its military and weapons.

2006-07-19 15:48:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i can only hope that sanity prevails and the world as a whole condemns and severally castigates the Israelis as well as conflicting some human humility in them as if this is allowed to continue we will all suffer the ultimate price.

2006-07-19 15:56:55 · answer #9 · answered by dodderish 2 · 0 0

Great answers! I'm proud of all of you. Evidently sincere thoughts, with no name-calling, no obscenity, and no back-stabbing. Best Yahoo Answers that I have seen.

2006-07-19 16:06:51 · answer #10 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers