After 200 plus year we never have a Women on White House as President ?

Answer 1

I believe 2008 is gonna bring a lot of surprises to the Republican party. Hillary just may be the first woman President. ( But then she's my horse if she never wins a race.) Thinking, about the future, Bill will be the first gentleman of the white house, if it happened. Before you start writing bad comments about his sex life, He was a damn good fellow. and never did anything those other idiots haven't done. I for one, the Lord willing am going too vote for Hillary if she decides to run . We need a woman in there for a change. I also believe she's mean enough to attack a country that has attacked us.. Not come up with a bunch of phoney reasons to attack another country that never attacked us. Get Bin Laudin I say yes go but I have questions that haven't been answered about Iraq VOTE HILLARY 2008

Answer 2

Time lapse is not a qualification for any race, any gender, or any religious preference. Each group has come a long way in the past two centuries, and the "good ole boys" idea doesn't always work anymore. Any woman who is qualified by education and practical experience, and who is willing to put in the hours and the money, and face up to both character assassination and the possibility of actual assassination can go for the White House.

Answer 3

There are several Countries on this globe that have women or have had woman presidents or prime ministers or rulers or whatever (the top person). Just not those with big egos for instance the US, Russia (I know there was Katherine the Great but that was a long time ago), China, N Korea, Iran, Iraq, Germany.

Answer 4

Not yet, but I've no doubt that the time is coming. And those women who hold the office will be especially capable in some capacities and annoyingly incapable in others, just as with the men who have sat in the Oval Office. Many will adore them, while others will consider them the bane of the Earth.

Answer 5

What i have been questioning is that if ANY member of a presidential crew who has close contact with the president is in the present day deemed extra qualified than any senator, congressman, or governor. in spite of everything, they comprehend how the White homestead works. they have already been element of one presidential time period, how puzzling might want to yet another one be? i imagine that it is entire garbage that Hillary is operating a campaign in accordance which include her adventure at the same time as very nearly all of that adventure became merely using her husband's coattails. the perception of balloting in accordance with adventure is stupid in any case. organizations that employ depending in basic terms on resumes finally end up with countless bored, self-righteous windbags. You employ the guy who quite needs to snatch the pastime by the horns and make it fairly their own. each president in history has nevertheless had plenty to study at the same time as they first took the placement.

Answer 6

I won't vote for a woman JUST BECAUSE she's a woman....if she looks like a sucky candidate, she won't get my vote.

On the other hand, if Condoleeza Rice ran, I'd likely vote for her.

It's about brains, not gender.

Answer 7

Because no woman is stupid enough to want such a stressful job, and if she is, do you really want her to be president??!

Answer 8

Nope.

Answer 9

Never had women. Never had blacks. Never had anything other that caucasian males.

Answer 10

never will either. won't have a black one or a gay one or any other minority one either. moment one hits the house, they'll be assasinated, guarantee it.