English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

24 answers

This comes from a woman that gave up her son when he was a child so she could persue her own interests. Then she whines about his death as if she ever had a relationship with him. Her son is rolling over in his grave as I speak... he was a good man and selflessly served his country! He is hoorah in my book and she is a POS... so why would anyone believe anything that comes out of her mouth?

2006-07-19 08:21:09 · answer #1 · answered by MadMaxx 5 · 3 3

I really haven't followed Ms. Sheehan closely; however, I applaud her for challenging the Thug President on the decisions he's made.

Comparing the Little Prince, aka the Baby Bush, with Chavez and Castro is being terribly unfair to the latter two. Although their form of leadership lacks somewhat, at least they *ARE LEADERS* ... for better or worse....er, what am I saying?! For better? Ah, yes.

A trained baboon could do what Bushikins has done (or has not done -- take your pick).
Golly, I did it again! I said a trained baboon "could do". LOL! Silly me. I'd venture to guess a trained baboon IS DOING the job of running Imperial Amerikkka right now! ::chuckle::

'Nuff said.

Best Wishes!

2006-07-19 10:04:32 · answer #2 · answered by Specious λ Neurotica 3 · 0 0

I don't believe that even liberals believe that statement! I know entertainer and activist Harry Bellefonte visited Chavez recently and spoke highly of him while calling our President a terroist. Cindy Sheehan as far as I'm concerned is an attention seeking activist looking to down our President and spewing with anti American venom and should leave America since she seems to hate it so much and live somewhere else.

2006-07-19 08:34:12 · answer #3 · answered by toughguy2 7 · 0 0

Cindy Sheehan is a mother who lost her son,I don't like Bush I never voted for him ,But castro and chavez give me a break,I not even that low

2006-07-19 08:44:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The USA has lost it's credibility, and is losing it's stranglehold on the rest of the world.
Hugo Chavez is a clear example of what can be achieved when countries disregard their orders from Washington:-
Over 17 million people now have access to free health care and medicines for the first time.
Over 1 million people taught to read and write.
Participation encouraged for all Venezuelans in the formation, implementation, and operation of their democracy.
Venezuela has become truly, of the people, by the people and for the people, after years of US intervention and suppression.

But of course the people in power in the USA have labelled Chavez a terrorist, communist, dictator, etc. etc.

Around the world, whenever an alternative political systems have emerged they have been brutally crushed, or isolated by our ruling elites for what they call "the threat of a good example"

There is at last hope for us all, a chance to end inequality, and injustice. :)

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0706-32.htm
http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/
http://www.vicuk.org/
http://www.embavenez-us.org/constitution/intro.htm

2006-07-19 09:10:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

So a liberal would rather live under a dictatorship than a democracy? That's hard to believe. If Cindy Sheehan said this, she is just ignorant or stupid.

2006-07-19 08:20:20 · answer #6 · answered by The Man 4 · 0 0

Cindy Sheehan is a liberal Dem, and the lowest form of life, why doesn't she get the hell out. She just loves the limelight you can tell by the strange look in her eyes she is not all their.

2006-07-19 08:38:12 · answer #7 · answered by hexa 6 · 0 0

Cindy Sheehan is far left wing anti American who should have her citizenship revoked and ship her pathetic *** to Venezuela where she can service her hero down there and hopefully she will die the deaths of a thousand terrorist with gonorrhea. She is a pure waste of human flesh.

2006-07-19 08:23:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hugo Chavez, BTW, is not a dictator but a democratically elected leader.

Seeing as neither Castro nor Chavez have invaded other countries under false pretenses, I'd have to say that's true.

2006-07-19 08:51:57 · answer #9 · answered by Rory McRandall 3 · 0 2

No, I am a liberal and i think Bush is better than Castro and Chavez. Simply because he allows me to call him stupid and disagree and doesnt have me killed for it.

2006-07-19 08:37:42 · answer #10 · answered by RATM 4 · 0 0

Absolutely not. Plus, you generally have to be elected in a free and fair election to be considered a president. There are those who would say that Bush's election wasn't "free and fair" but that's generally just sour grapes.

2006-07-19 10:01:45 · answer #11 · answered by digitalrancher 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers