English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

20 answers

okay, for one, if the u.s. became like france, this world would be in hell with a hand basket. another thing, if the u.s. was like canada, who would take care of all the other countries? canada doesnt have much of an army and they dont ever use it.

2006-07-19 07:49:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

The US should become more like Canada and Canada should become more like France.

Why?

First, the US needs to be liked more internationally, like Canada. If the US acted more like Canada, it wouldn't be in all the mess it is in today, nor would it be constantly fearing attacks.

I believe that the US can still remain in its hegemonic position without having to have military superiority.

Second. Canada needs to be more like France. In the sense that we need stricter immigration policies.


BTW--AngelNteddy4eva--canada doesn't need to have large army because we are never in sh*t. However, we deploy thousands of people all around the world to do peacekeeping for the UN.

2006-07-19 07:50:53 · answer #2 · answered by Tulip 3 · 0 0

What you mean socialist. No, the problem with socialism is that it robs people of their freedom to choose. I think (like most liberals do) you have it backwards. The would would be a much better place if countries like france would stand united with us to stop terrorism. If the rest of the world banded together against these bullies they would have no power.

2006-07-19 07:53:28 · answer #3 · answered by Ethan M 5 · 0 0

France is one bill away from being a true communist state. You know what it is? Freedom of speech. That's all that remains, so no. We're close enough to losing democracy as it is. Canada, we could be more like them internally. They have a very low homicidal rate.
No. the world would not be better.

2006-07-19 07:48:13 · answer #4 · answered by Scrib 2 · 0 0

Define "like Canada or France?"

2006-07-19 07:47:38 · answer #5 · answered by TEMS 2 · 0 0

lots of the different solutions supply the needed stats. even if, right here in us of a of america, the prepare is declining, as further and further people keep in mind that the circumcision damage to the neural and vascular platforms of the penis easily will not advance sexual sensitivity and performance. Europe, Scandinavia, South us of a of america and maximum of Asia hardly circumcise adult males, and by no skill have, and they function somewhat properly, with out the feared ailments that are supposedly prevented (and in all reality at the prompt are not) by skill of circumcision. HIV prices are continually decrease in those aspects, disproving the propaganda that circumcision helps to stay away from HIV. HIV is easily a lot more suitable established between circumcised adult males. female circumcision of little ones is illegitimate in all civilized international places, because that is genital mutilation. So is male circumcision---genital mutilation is genital mutilation, inspite of the sex of the sufferer. Mutilating little ones is a detestable and barbaric abuse of little ones. Circumcision is the worst hoax ever perpetrated on the male sex. A foreskin isn't a delivery disorder; it really is a birthright. ERIC

2016-12-10 12:00:42 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

neither, The U.S. has given more aid and FREEDOM than any other country.What has France done? or Canada...ban private ownership of guns so the people can not defend themselves or overthrow the government if they choose ?basically calling their citizens incapable of handling a firearm because of incompetents ? exactly what is so good about those countries ?
maybe the way they suck off the American economy !

2006-07-19 07:57:44 · answer #7 · answered by ronchoward 3 · 0 0

No.

France supported Saddam because they had lucrative oil contracts with him. They sold him weapons and loaned him money to finance his secret police.

And Canada is simply irrelevant.

2006-07-19 08:02:57 · answer #8 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0 0

Ofcourse not, you are confusing America and its diverse population and unique qualities with its goverment which needs to make the change for a better world.

2006-07-19 07:49:21 · answer #9 · answered by Charlooch 5 · 0 0

the world will become a better place if bush just leaves other countries alone and mind his own business!

2006-07-19 07:48:46 · answer #10 · answered by ebe88 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers