ok if Iraq possesed WMDs and Bush took over Iraq because they have WMDs.. then why doesn't Bush take over Russia or N.Korea or India or better yet.. ISRAEL???
Israel regardless of the other countries mentioned, have enough WMDs to blow up 1/5 of the world..
Why doesn't Bush even speak about this matter??
Another thing. If Iran have a Nuclear power station that is said to be running a hazard to neighbouring countries. Then why isn't the US doing anything about THE 25 YEAR OLD POWER PLANT IN ISRAEL THAT CAN BLOW UP ANY SECOND????????????
2006-07-19 07:29:41 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
NO NO NO
2006-07-19 15:39:15 · answer #1 · answered by CottonPatch 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Every time I think there is hope for mankind, someone like you comes along to make me realize we're completely screwed...
We didn't invade iraq because they possessed wmd, we invaded iraq because they weren't supposed to have them. There are no fewer than a half dozen reasons we invaded iraq. The possession of WMD and the ability to produce and use them on a civilian population were only three of them.
Israel isn't the issue. Who has israel attacked without provocation? How long did you expect them to sit by and just take soliders being kidnapped and rockets landing in in their cities?
2006-07-19 07:44:03 · answer #2 · answered by trc_6111 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Israel has shown great restraint and hasn't actually used their WMD's. Iran on the other hand, would more than likely export their nukes. Iran has threatened to use their nukes in a first strike capability. Israel would use theirs only as a last resort.
So who's the bigger threat?
2006-07-19 07:39:17 · answer #3 · answered by darkemoregan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You want Israel to be accountable for it's actions. You must be an anti-Semetic.
2006-07-19 07:56:51 · answer #4 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They have no natural resources for the U.S. to plunder.
2006-07-19 07:35:02 · answer #5 · answered by Juan232 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋