2006-07-19 07:01:58 · 21 answers · asked by Fishlova 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Environment. What would the point of having a lot of money be if the earth can no longer support us?
2006-07-19 07:04:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Money, cause if I had money I would help save the environment. Because if I'm the only one trying to save the environment and broke, it wouldn't make a difference because I am only one person and if it only took one person to save the environment it would of been better years ago.
2006-07-19 14:19:51 · answer #2 · answered by kay2006 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would say save the environment... because without the environment and air and everything that we rely on for human kind to go on living ...what good is money???
i do believe it is too late to try and save the environment...at least that is what i heard about 2 weeks ago on the news... that there is too much air pollution and smog to even correct the problem with the ozone layer.... So hell ... spend all the money you can now while there is still an environment to spend it in
2006-07-19 14:07:22 · answer #3 · answered by kimapsydal99 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I had a lot of money I would say save the environment. Lacking of it though I would have to say save my money because what good is the environment if you cannot afford to be in it. Who knows?
2006-07-19 14:05:35 · answer #4 · answered by cherie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Isn't saving the environment in the end be saving your money as well as your communities money? It's hard to think, but, i would only contribute a budgeted amount for the environment, and save for myself my priority.It's like saying "how can one do with interior designing if he got only 10 bucks? Well, he can start by just buying a broom first."
But if that environmental concern needs top priority, even if i had the money, i would still coordinate with the community, media, etc for assistance since many would like to share too.
When that project is then accomplished. I wouldn't brag I did it. But rather, "How nice! WE did it."
2006-07-19 14:15:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Save the environment---but I want to save money, too.
2006-07-19 14:04:57 · answer #6 · answered by violetb 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The environment. Don't get me wrong, I like $, but only my family will benefit from that when I'm gone. If i had a way to save the environment all of humanity would benefit.
2006-07-19 14:07:22 · answer #7 · answered by Nichole 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is a good Question. I will need to think, since I can't spend the money saved if I die of pollution, and I can't save the environment because I may not live long enough to enjoy it. Huh! Very interesting. I'll need to get back with you on that one... Very good one though.
2006-07-19 14:05:49 · answer #8 · answered by Justanothergirl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Money of course.
Because in order to save the environment on the level expected by the tree huggers, it would create more poverty which in turn would raise taxes in order to support those poor folks who support saving the environment.
Got that?
2006-07-19 14:05:30 · answer #9 · answered by kathy059 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My money is much more at risk than the environment. My money really is being sucked away, while most stories about the environment dying is just hysteria.
2006-07-19 14:06:48 · answer #10 · answered by Farly the Seer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋