English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Roe V Wade is not going to be overturned any time soon, (if ever in my opinion) so wouldn't it be in the best interest of science and those that would benefit from it to allow embryonic stem cell research?

Embryos are not destroyed for the purpose of research rather destroyed embryos can be used for research. Is it hypocritical for those that are anti-abortion to take a different point of view of a present situation (legal abortion) and allow human life to benefit from it.

Can you be pro-life yet supportive of embryonic stem cell research?

2006-07-19 06:04:50 · 6 answers · asked by Pretty_Trini_Rican 5 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Again, based on the understanding that embryos are NOT destroyed for the purpose of research..is it wrong to support something that can save other lives. The research is after the fact (abortion beit spontaneous or voluntary)

2006-07-19 06:11:17 · update #1

6 answers

President Bush is against spending government money for embryonic research. I am against spending government money for embryonic research also. Private stem cell research may go on as does research in every other aspect of scientific discovery. Why should taxpayers have to fund this particular project? Private industry will take care of it just as it has with thousands of other medical issues.

Furthermore, why embryonic? Haven't adult stem cells proven to be as effective in this research? Why do we have to pursue the gruesomeness of taking cells from a discarded fertilized human embryo?

2006-07-19 06:20:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well let me just say that the only success they have had out of embryonic stem cell research has been big massive tumor growths. While at the same time adult harvested stem cell research has caused the lame to walk the blind to see and cured many afflictions so why even address this controversial topic if it doesn't seem likely to produce anything.

2006-07-19 06:12:36 · answer #2 · answered by ♂ Randy W. ♂ 6 · 0 0

yes one can. stem cells can be harvested from the umbilical cord after a successful birth.
Interesting how "religious" people try to force their morality on others when the bible tells them "judge not that ye be not judged". In the end all will get what's coming to them and it's going to be way worse than anything one human can do to another. do they realize hate is the fuel and the tool of the devil, that's why we're instructed to love one another, without exception.

2006-07-19 06:16:06 · answer #3 · answered by Alan S 7 · 0 0

Abortion may nicely be criminal notwithstanding it is incorrect and evil and outright homicide to an probability free unborn newborn. imagine about it that kid will under no circumstances see sunlight hours or snigger or journey a motorbike or savour having friends or comprehend the love of a be certain. This unborn newborn will under no circumstances comprehend the failings that we take with little interest in our time-honored lifes. Plus that kid is torn to products in the course of the abortion it is between the techniques that is killed ripped limb from limb. So therefore i imagine stem cellular analyze is inaccurate also. after all you've already brought with reference to the unborn infant a lot misery and discomfort and brought it is existence from it so a minimum of go away their undesirable bodies on my own. Abortion and Stem cellular analyze are only yet another one in all mankind's vile and cruel and evil issues. I pray that God may have mercy on all of people that get abortions and function had abortions. i'm satisfied that those undesirable children will stay with him and heaven always. i received't make it there myself who's easily-known with yet a minimum of they could. in order that that you comprehend no newborn is an coincidence all of them come the following with a purpose yet some under no circumstances have the threat to fulfill there purpose as a results of cruelty of mankind. faster or later it is going to come to bypass that we may might want to account for the failings we've done and presented that we are quite sorry and regretful for those issues do we be forgiven. i comprehend that there are some who will see this in yet differently than me along with atheist and people of non-christian or perhaps some christian religions notwithstanding it is superb interior the top of time it ought to come to bypass that what i think is inaccurate yet i do not care because i'm chuffed for now. nicely there you've my opinion.

2016-10-14 23:16:06 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

government sponsoring of stem cell research using aborted fetes should not be acceptable to any anti-abortion advocate. private companies can do research without the governments approval.

2006-07-19 06:15:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

"Can you be pro-life yet supportive of embryonic stem cell research?"

ABSOLUTELY NOT

2006-07-19 06:09:26 · answer #6 · answered by tiredofliberals 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers