can a liberal be pro life?

Question

i support a ban on abortion as i see-it life begins with the division of cells and ends when that divison does . i do not want to get more technical then this as it would confuse the consevative brain to much cause religion is no where to be found .GOD did not make life begin sperm and egg did.
For if liberal minded people can agree that life begins at this point and not the rights of those more advanced along in the stage of development .then you could see that this life needs to be protected .WE all agree that a tree begins as a seed and cared for from this point becomes a mighty oak .So why do the seeds of man planted within a women become less then the earliest begginings of life and nurtured along will become as whole as nature intended.
I can't among my beliefs accept that with out acknowledgement of this as life we can ever become free as we where intended .MAN must decide based on truth what is right here forget GOD and look at the facts life begins at egg and sperm .

Answer 1

A liberal can be anything because a liberal believes in LIBERTY.

Answer 2

You are the answer to your own question. Why must we all be placed in a box of liberal or conservative? I think most of us are somewhere in the middle. I personally am glad I chose life but I also do not feel its right for everyone else to make decisions for women who are in unfortunate circumstances and seek an abortion. The back alley abortion clinics will start again if it becomes illegal. The need for them will not go away so I think we should make it safe and humane as possible. We should support birth control and prevention first and also I would like to see technology come forward with an early detection and early as possible abortion. I do not agree with it unless its super early and in the stage of cells forming not wait til its a baby and then decide, that is wrong, inhumane, and it should be mandatory that the woman see it on the new ultrasound that shows what the fetus looks like before she make this decision.

I support a womans right to choose but only if its an early choice.

Answer 3

If would be nice if you could ask a question without the long preachy lecture on what you believe.

But the answer to your question is that there are many liberals who are Pro Life, just as there are many Republicans who believe a woman owns hew body and they are Pro Choice.

The reasons why the laws have never been overturned is because too many people, both Democrat and Republican, feel it is an issue between the woman, her doctor and her God. And you'll never have enough votes to enact such a ban.

Answer 4

Sure, a liberal can be pro life. A conservative can be pro-choice.
Being a Liberal means that you support the Liberal position on most of the issues (+70%). Also, there is a big difference between trying to stop someone and killing someone. You know what I mean, punk?

Answer 5

Supposedly. you could likely evaluate your self a liberal and be professional-existence. in spite of the indisputable fact that it quite doesn't slot in with the liberal view element. the biggest ingredient about being a liberal is being creative, and putting forward that a lady will change right into a slave the prompt she will change into pregnant isn't creative. it truly is exactly what the pro-existence flow is. It says that a fetus has a top to existence. To have a top to existence, then it needs a top to the aspects that provide it existence. meaning blood for oxygen and nutrition besides because the uterus itself for safe practices. therefore to have a top to existence, it has to have a top to someone's' body. it truly is a top no human individual has.

Answer 6

So which came first, the woman and man, or the sperm and egg? Here's a hot tip for ya: God ceated man and woman, then sperm and egg. The latter was not needed until the former was achieved. The entire theory of evolution is completely nonsensical and every argument for it is as leaky as a sieve. And for your information, I comletely understand the cellular division you are referring to. It's just that your premise is incorrect.

Answer 7

The problem is the pro-choice group doesn't care about ANY life

there was a law that was going to be passed a while back that would have made so that if somebody killed a woman who was pregnant, and therefore killed the baby, they would be tried for two murders - the pro-choice groups fought against the law!!

They don't care about choice, they simply have no value for life (and of course the doctors want to keep making money on killing babies)

Answer 8

The term "pro-life" is a deception.Wrongly believing the government must make the judgement of who can do what with their own body is hardly pro-life,of all things.

And the "life begins at conception" crowd have many mental frailties they like to keep under wraps.Another dirty little secret.

And yes "libs" are pro-choice on free speech retrotrancer.Prancer!

Answer 9

Forgetting all the religious nonsense... a liberal can be pro-life and a conservative can be pro-choice... there are other issues that make liberals and conservatives than abortion and the resultant overpopulation of the world which will result.

Answer 10

How many liberal pro-life elected politicians are there?

ANSWER: zero

You can be liberal and pro-life, but don't expect to win any elections.

Liberals believe in choice, as long as the subject is abortion. When it comes to assault rifles, human slavery, free speech, suddenly libs aren't quite so pro-choice.

Answer 11

a liberal CAN be pro-life and many liberals ARE. political ideology is not determined by one's position on any one and only issue. however, the closest thing that present-day american conservatism had to a litmus test is the conviction that abortion should be banned or at least severely restricted in every jurisdiction in the world.