English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

bush has failed both.

2006-07-19 05:10:49 · 15 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

the war in Iraq is certainly killing a lot more people - 50,000 civilian Iraqis is the latest estimate, so I would say it is worse than the economy

2006-07-19 05:13:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I could be mistaken, but I find that the economy is doing well, but the war here in Iraq is a total embarrassment. This war is being run by the opposition to Bush, because he wants to stay politically correct and look good to the media (if that's such a thing). The bad part about all this is the soldiers here in Iraq are restricted to what they can do...instead of going out and kicking some butt. If they'd take the hardline approach, then they'd be home by now, but by taking this "wuss" approach, it's going to stretch this war out for years........

2006-07-19 05:15:33 · answer #2 · answered by cajunrescuemedic 6 · 0 0

The war in Iraq is the problem with the economy. So if we have to choose - I would say the war.

2006-07-19 05:16:30 · answer #3 · answered by Me 1 · 0 0

No Bush did no longer have some thing to do with the commercial equipment going undesirable, if some thing the warfare helped the commercial equipment by using retaining people employed construction protection rigidity vehicles, guns, and ammunition. grasping company butt heads brought about each of the major complications of our economic equipment, along with the deepest loan businesses promoting abode to those who ought to no longer have the funds for them even as their expenditures replaced or promoting houses for 2 or 3 situations their cost, the banks stumbled on out what the deepest loan businesses were doing and joined the journey and then there is the automobile industries which kept on construction large severe priced gas hogs even although gas prices were hovering better and better and the customers were stressful smaller and extra gasoline powerful vehicles. So how will the Obamabots spin this to make it Bush administration fault. i comprehend that once Obama fails and he will, he will blame it on Bush. No i do no longer desire he fails because eveeryone along with myself will wade through, yet Obama isn't prepared nor does he have the adventure to manage each little thing, he has in truth bit off extra then he can bite, if he did quit smoking he will commence smoking again and he may even carry out somewhat mary jane.

2016-10-14 23:12:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

War in Iraq.

2006-07-19 05:14:51 · answer #5 · answered by The Man 4 · 0 0

Typical Liberal crap. The economy is strong and the war is going fine. I know, you would have peace at any cost. You would sell us out for a hand shake. You are a fool.

2006-07-19 05:14:47 · answer #6 · answered by ndmac 5 · 0 0

I am not a fan of President Bush, but the economy is fine. Unemployment is low, inflation is OK, growth is solid.

HEY, FIREFIGHTER! IN WHAT WAY IS THE ECONOMY GOING POORLY?

2006-07-19 05:19:03 · answer #7 · answered by desotobrave 6 · 0 0

the economy is not bad and war with fundamentalist islam is inevitable, why dont you go ask your daddy what else he thinks about bush

2006-07-19 05:12:54 · answer #8 · answered by TruthHurts 3 · 0 0

Obviously the war. you get soldiers who were told to go there for no good reason who keep dying everyday, you get civilians who get shot by soldiers (either too nervous, or some sadistic ones), and you get insurgents who are tired of being occupied and die to free their country. a whole mess.

2006-07-19 05:17:10 · answer #9 · answered by theedge 2 · 0 0

Considering the fact that my soldiers are dying every ****** day I would say the WAR in Irag hands down..

2006-07-19 05:14:18 · answer #10 · answered by JDINFLA 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers