English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Which would you choose? I'd go with isolation personally!

2006-07-19 04:51:50 · 84 answers · asked by cc 6 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

it's a simple question cpt_tho_extreme,no need to be nasty.

2006-07-19 04:55:25 · update #1

Harvey, shut up. I can't write what I want to or i'll get reported. And no, I'm not a dyke,idiot.

2006-07-19 08:47:00 · update #2

84 answers

Isolation.... after a few weeks I would make a few friends.. even if they are voices in my head... because if I was with my enemy hehe i'd kick his *** and ultimately be in isolation so it just saves time really :)

2006-07-19 04:53:56 · answer #1 · answered by SilentAssassin 3 · 5 2

Isolation

2006-07-19 04:53:30 · answer #2 · answered by Snuffy Smith 5 · 0 0

Worst enemy cos whatever happens a bond is formed whether voluntarily or otherwise. There's always something to learn from others whether we like them or not. Isolation always sounds appealing if you think of it as a break from noise, hassle, etc etc, truth is the majority would only enjoy it for a few days in the anticipation of returning to the outside world later. Prolonged isolation is the surest route to losing one's mind.

2006-07-19 05:02:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Isolation.

2006-07-19 10:17:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Depends. If I choose isolation, do I get the £100,000 like the other people in Big Brother? If not ... I'd still choose isolation, because I don't have enemies - everyone loves me!!!!

2006-07-19 05:07:03 · answer #5 · answered by HiFi 3 · 0 0

Isolation.

2006-07-19 04:53:51 · answer #6 · answered by Mila 2 · 0 0

I would have to choose isolation. Even my own worst enemy couldn't stand me when I am cranky from being around a person I don't like.

2006-07-19 05:42:55 · answer #7 · answered by Plain_Common_Sense 4 · 0 0

I'd choose living with my worst enemy. At least I still can go anywhere...
I mean, if I'm in isolation, then I wud be only all alone out there??? It's pathetic!

2006-07-19 08:51:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Oh definitely isolation. I'd give almost anything to be able to live in a cabin in the woods in the middle of nowhere for awhile just to get out of the city and people and noise in general.

2006-07-19 04:56:36 · answer #9 · answered by whtecloud 5 · 0 0

As long as I had books to read then I would pick isolation, although I don't think having to be around your worst enemy would be that bad. I think that after awhile with no one else around you probably wouldn't be enemies any more.

2006-07-19 04:56:11 · answer #10 · answered by ibsally 3 · 0 0

I'd go with the worst enemy, you never know what could happen in a year, you may be able to talk through your differences and end up with a great friend by the end of that year!!!

2006-07-19 04:55:16 · answer #11 · answered by nick m 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers