English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A. George Bush - USA
B. Tony Blair - GB
C. Kim Jung IL - NK
D. Ahmadinejad - Iran
E. Yahya Jammeh - The Gambia

2006-07-19 04:16:29 · 16 answers · asked by Timeless 2 in Politics & Government Politics

OK as u can see, u don't necessarily have to go with the list there. i admit it, its a pretty stupid list, thats the irony of it :o)

2006-07-19 04:26:02 · update #1

16 answers

None... a leader is the one who really contribute to this mankind, a great leader has followers.... the greatest leader is the one whom are being talked before his birth, during his life and after his death... the only greatest leader that i've known is Propet Mohammed, his existance had been talked in the Torat, Zabur and the original Bibble, way before he was born... and now 1.2 billions of world population is still talking and refering lots of examples by stating or refering with his name.

2006-07-19 04:26:02 · answer #1 · answered by n9flyboy 4 · 0 1

Personally, I would go with Ahmadinejad. While I disagree on how he is going about it, he seems to be trying to get Iran more power on the world stage, which can only be good for Iran. He seems to be trying to clean up their military, their economy, he has established a nearly noncorrupt (no government is completely incorrupt, but he is closer than many) government. He knows Iran's position and doesn't overextend it like Bush and Blair did theirs, he is raising Iran when Bush and Blair and now it looks like Kim Jong Il as well are dragging theirs down into possible destruction and certainly loss of power.

I've never heard of the last guy or what he is doing, so I can't answer to him and didn't include him in my considerations.

But I would like to emphasize I do not agree with how Ahmadenijad is trying to raise Iran, only that he seems to be actually doing it as opposed to Bush and Blair for their countries.

2006-07-19 11:21:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Neither! Maybe of these Tony Blair is the least fanatical and most democratic, George Bush has the greatest power split with Ahamadinejad and Kim Jung. It is yet to be seen...

2006-07-19 11:20:57 · answer #3 · answered by Tones 5 · 0 0

Of the people you listed, I have to give it to Tony Blair for a couple of specific reasons:

1- He is FORCED to answer to his constituents on a REGULAR basis. He has to stand before Parliament and answer their questions, regardless of whether or not he likes them...
2- He can INTELLIGENTLY debate his position. You do not have to agree with him or like him, but he at least comes across as UNDERSTANDING the delicacies of what he his talking about!

2006-07-19 11:20:04 · answer #4 · answered by erni_evilsizer 2 · 0 0

Nelson Mandela

2006-07-19 11:20:57 · answer #5 · answered by NJ 2 · 0 0

Sorry but this guy isn't on your list, George Washington. The reason he is, he is historically one of the best leaders of the U.S. and he did what few men in history ever did , he walked away from power

2006-07-19 11:20:29 · answer #6 · answered by magpie 6 · 0 0

This list sucks. Bush is clearly not the best, however. His money--not his skills--got him the presidency. And since Blair is up his ***, he's ruled out too.

2006-07-19 11:22:14 · answer #7 · answered by Mick 2 · 0 0

Alfred E. Newman

2006-07-19 11:20:13 · answer #8 · answered by gamerunner2001 6 · 0 0

as evil as he was, Stalin was the greatest leader, built a huge empire which stood long after his death

(I'm not saying Stalin was good in any way, I'm just saying he had unbelievable leadership power)

2006-07-19 11:19:51 · answer #9 · answered by anonacoup 7 · 0 0

not 1 of the above.

The only real Leader is God!!

2006-07-19 11:20:28 · answer #10 · answered by ans 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers