English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-19 02:10:35 · 9 answers · asked by shazam 6 in Politics & Government Politics

or conversely that all but one voted for it.

2006-07-19 02:11:32 · update #1

9 answers

She is a repuglican politician before she is a woman or a human. Most can see that much research needs to be done in this area, it holds the possibility of curing many terrible diseases. She is pandering to a right wing conservative group so that she can be reelected so that she can make more terrible votes like this one.

2006-07-19 02:28:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

All other senators are playing politics, and not listening to the research. The other senators are trying to gather liberal votes. If they took time to look at the information provided by the research. They would see that adult stem cells offer the same things that an embryonic stem cell does. When we kill the embryo from an embryonic stem cell, how do we not know that embryo would have grown up to offer more to the world than Albert Einstein.

2006-07-19 02:29:56 · answer #2 · answered by creative_idea_thinker 2 · 0 0

Franken did not carry his concept some distance sufficient. As written it in basic terms said do not do organization Halliburton in the journey that they require someone signal the kind of settlement. That on my own will be sufficient for me to vote hostile to it. If it is incorrect for Halliburton it is incorrect for ALL authorities contractors. Now IF Franken had written a bill that could make such ALL clauses unlawful AND make the clauses retroactive null and void hence establishing those who would or did dedicate such acts as you describe subject to prosecution i'd say you'll have a valid aspect. because it is Franken did not even deal with providing recourse for the guy. playing devil's recommend-- you want to imagine about it for a minute. Does what the guy signed mean she can't carry civil or criminal costs hostile to the persons who (i'm in basic terms being politically astounding now) allegededly did theses issues. or merely say she will be able to't sue Halliburton if it occurs? If a lady operating for an organization is raped in a company parking zone. Is the corporation to blame for the rape? i'm no longer putting forward she wasn't raped or that the corporation did not do each little thing they ought to have if she became raped. merely that i imagine there is so a lot extra to this than is roofed on your source. and that i don't have self belief Franken's bill covers the full deal initiate to end. except you comprehend why those Senators voted hostile to the bill you mustn't be too severe of their vote. Franken's bill is a 0.5 degree. And 0.5 degree expenditures in Congress ARE the rationalization for the significant issues dealing with this usa excellent this second. Franken's bill is type of a physician who does open heart surgical treatment and depart the chest open and says which will look after the region. If the kind of clause is undesirable for someone who does organization with the authorities, it is undesirable for any entity everywhere.

2016-11-06 20:02:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think anti-stem cell people are just stupid, but there are not that many female senators and especially conservative ones, so it makes sense that only 1 female senator will vote in a conservative way.

2006-07-19 02:15:20 · answer #4 · answered by errai14 2 · 0 0

Perhaps she answers to a very conservative district. Voting for it would have not boded well for a reelection.

Perhaps she does not believe in the advancement of science.

Perhaps she ascribes to a higher moral code than most of the other women in the Senate.

2006-07-19 02:16:33 · answer #5 · answered by Robin J. Sky 4 · 0 0

I would think that Sen Dole wishes to run again in a very Conservative district and like Bush feels the needs to pander to those constituents.

2006-07-19 02:13:33 · answer #6 · answered by olderandwiser 4 · 0 0

Could be she voted as the people she represents wanted her to, which is why people get elected, or not re-elected. Too many politicians vote for only their feelings and not of the people they are supposed to represent!

2006-07-19 02:26:46 · answer #7 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 0 0

Women are, by nature, nurturers (Dole excluded). They tend to put the needs of others over their needs.

2006-07-19 02:27:48 · answer #8 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 0 0

Perhaps the rest have done their research?

2006-07-19 02:13:04 · answer #9 · answered by godoompah 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers