Wouldn't our tax dollars be better spent on stem cell research than bombs for Iraq?

Question

George Busch is expected to veto a bill which would use tax dollars for stem cell research.
How do you feel about this?

Answer 1

It is spelled BUSH. You must be an illegal, but, you have a good point.
Even though our leader used the word SHEEEEIT describing the terrorist Syrians, which was cool, he might be a little constricting on the stem cells. Abortion is wrong, if you have any education, as a nurse, doctor, farmer-you know life is precious at any stage, plant or animal. We need to find a way for the extremist pro-life peoples to accept a measure of stem cell research that doesn't interfere with the production of life, hence producing the beginning of scientific research with free will of progress in every minute form, that will prove beneficial for all mankind. What the hell did I just say? I'm tow up from the flow up.

Answer 2

Does it matter? You have your mind made up already. So why ask the question.

Bush is against stem cell research, we have known that since 2000 so this is nothing new. If you were to read the Bill, Bush is only vetoing government finance of these stem cell programs. But public companies can still do it. It doesn't stop them at all. Many large medical facilities and Universities are doing stem cell research today.

The Bill will only stop the funding from the government. But the government has never funded them anyways.

And don't you think you are comparing apples to oranges? Stem cells and the war on terror really are not in the same ball park.

Answer 3

i hope he vetoes the bill. i support ethical stem cell research on cells obtained from adults and cord blood. i oppose the destruction of human embryos. unfortunately the media does not present a balanced view about stem cells. they only focus on embryonic stem cells while ignoring advances in adult stem cell research. if he vetoes the bill, i applaud him for doing what he told his constituents he would do and not bowing down to what poll numbers say.

Answer 4

When you have someone you love that is no hope except some new breakthrough like stem cell research I'll for it. I rather spent money to use it to help the sick then bombing and making other suffer.

Answer 5

persist with the money. even although grownup stem-cellular study is the only stem-cellular study that has produced clever outcomes, the scientific community keeps pursuing the pie-in-the-sky embryonic stem-cellular study dream (nightmare). It has to do with patents and income. employing your man or woman cells to save you isn't a technique which could be patented. Why do politicians help it? the respond back of direction is money. This time the money comes from lobbyists. don't think their disingenuous arguments approximately being concerned concerning to the ill, etc. maximum politicians are mendacity if their mouth is shifting. in the event that they actually cared approximately human beings, they could concentration on grownup stem-cellular study that's the place all conceivable treatments are coming from.

Answer 6

Stem cell research is more predictive. Lets mack peace not ware.Why don't we give peace a chance.

Answer 7

well i agree with you
but george bush would probably say "but theres a lot of people against stem cell research, its so controversial"

but, i would say the same thing right back at him. "theres a lot of people against you. theres more people against the war than there are against stem cell research."

Answer 8

Stem cell research is vastly more important I believe. It has, possibly, the ability to give us so much more insight into diseases like cancer and AIDS.

Answer 9

Nope!! I disagree!!!