I believe there is only one basic experimental design. For detailed illustration: http://wwf.edula.com/content/topics/reveal.html . Do you agree with me?
2006-07-18 21:12:53 · 6 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
The link you cite is full of nonsensical assertions and profound logical flaws. You would do far better to read a proper text on scientific method and the philosophy of science.
2006-07-18 21:19:59 · answer #1 · answered by Epidavros 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In science, there are so many experimental desigens. The design should give more information, what we expect. For example, the laboratory experiments, the Simple Randomized Block Design, Completely Randomized Block Design etc. For the field experiments, there are suitable design of experiments like Factorial Randomized Block Design, Split plot design, Split split plot design, Strip plot design, Balanced incomplete block design and so on. We have to select suitable experimental design for our study.
2006-07-18 22:57:48 · answer #2 · answered by K.J. Jeyabaskaran K 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Experimental layout is the logical argument for why your test will instruct what it is meant to instruct (as an occasion in case you want to instruct that A is brought about with the aid of B, how does your test instruct it is no longer brought about with the aid of C, D, or E. Or in case you want to discover which of X Y or Z is the "ultimate" for doing some thing, how can you exclude issues that could make the assessment unfair). Experimental technique is the nitty-gritty of what you genuinely do once you carry out the test.
2016-11-02 08:08:53 · answer #3 · answered by belschner 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Experiments point towards whether we are proceeding in the right direction. This will have to be utilised to better the design and further experiments will have to be carreid out. Assumptions made during design will have to brought nearer to actual based on experiments. Naturally, in a no. of cases design has to be reworked.
VR
2006-07-18 21:28:35 · answer #4 · answered by sarayu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sam.
You're going to get yourself quite confused with the "experiments" you have given us the link to.
The problem is any characteristic of any system or thing is based on it's invariants, not by it's variants.
For example, variants in the Characteristics of a man are the colour of his hair, eyes, skin, etc... Invariants are things like his genitilia , dna and chromosome count.. These describe the characteristics.
Your link is very vague and like many "guru" sciences, including religion, rely on that very vagueness to create it's own credibility.
2006-07-18 21:27:10 · answer #5 · answered by simsjk 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your design is flawed you missed out
To find
the characteristics of a woman
Vary a woman by action.
Compare the woman to the variants she forms on action.
The differences and similarities observed on comparison are the characteristics of the woman.
2006-07-18 21:37:11 · answer #6 · answered by Mr Hex Vision 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋