Only once in my entire life was I struck by the physical beauty of someone else (in person)...and to this day I can't explain what it was, exactly, that made my heart jump into my throat at the mere sight of him, but, a description...
he had perfect skin, perfectly smooth and tanned, and his eyes were a dark, dark green, with a languorous quality to them. He moved with a carefree grace that radiated confidence. Every feature was in perfect symmetry and his clothing looked carelessly thrown together . He wasn't overly muscular, in fact on the skinny side, though without being scrawny...it is hard to describe pure physical beauty, as it is such a subjective thing, but even a horrible writer can recognize being in the presence of it. And, on that day, I was.
He made me understand the perfection of all those greek bronzes in art history.
2006-07-18 19:41:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by benjilove 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Male...Ashton Kutcher..I really don't think describing him is neccessary. That's TOO obvious.
His skeletal frame is in perfect perportion.
He has long and shapely legs
He has a strong but not too strong sloping forehead.
Nose perfect shape and size
Eyebrows not too thin or too thick and perfectly shaped with the perfect amount of pointness in the center of them.
his eyes are dreamy with very long dark eyelashes.
His jaw line is the kind EVERYONE wants
High cheekbones
Neck not too wide, not too slender
Perfect muscles...Not overly built
Small wrists with long slender fingers
His feet aren't too big
His back is perfectly straight
his walk is perfect.
His hair is not too thick or too thin and is very shiny and silky
He has just enough wave to his hair to give it body and a sexy look.
His teeth are beautiful
His skin is flawless
Female..I would have to say Julie Newmar from the 1960s.
She has been acknowledged by MANY, over the decades as being the actress with the most beautiful body and face in history.
MANY would argue about the perfection of her face because THAT is REALLy a matter of opinion.
She has always been referred to as being the most statuesque of ALL the actresses in history.
She is tall and gracefull
Her legs are perfectly shaped and are about a mile long.
Her neck is long and slender.
She is what is considered as, having the perfect body.
Waist being 10 inches smaller than her bust and hips, which in the world of perfection, the bust and hips should be the same circumference. The waist 10 inches smaller.
She was/is well indowed in the bust but not overly.
Her back is extremly straight
she has wide/broad shoulders, just like Ashton Kutcher, without them being overly built as to compromise their natural beauty
She has very pouty plump lips with pointed upper lip at the top.
She has that beautiful strong jawline Just like Ashton.
Her skin is flawless
She has very beautiful cheekbones.
Many have stated that she looks like she was carved out of marble by Michael Angelo. It's true! Unbeleivable!
Her eyes have a limped dreamy look to them and are large.
Her hair is thick and very silky and shiny.
Long slender graceful hands and fingers.
She has a perfectly shaped forehead.
Like Ashton, her eyebrows make a perfect point in the center.
I know I'VE never seen her rival!
She is perfection, personified.
If you ever watched the old TV show from the 1960s, "BATMAN", you can catch her in episodes, where she played "CATWOMAN"
In the movie ""To Man Choo, Thanks for Everything, Julie Newmar", you will see a photo of her several times posing. She was often posing in swimwear back then because she was so famous for having the most perfect face and body in history and people wanted to see it. She was and still is amazingly gorgeous and perfect in every way.
At the end of the movie she makes a cameo appearance as herself.
You can EASILY identify her when she stands there looking into the camera and smiles, just from my description. Her eyes are almost catlike and are huge.
She was always referred to as being STATUESQUE. That line is mentioned in the movie. She Still IS! DAMN!
For her age, she is hot!
There has never been another actress that looks like her.
When you aee HER, your chin drops. Even Women's.
2006-07-18 20:17:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Molly 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Vivien Leigh, from the Gone with the Wind, was just purely gorgeous. She had beautiful big brown eyes, long curly eyelashes, small but full curvy lips, perfectly shaped face, good height, lovely and well-proportioned body, etc. Vivien was a magneficient drama queen.
For a male, I'd say Mark-Paul Gosselaar, an actor most well-known from the popular 80's-90's tv show "Saved by the Bell". He's the only celebrity I can't help slightly obsessing over... a description:
He's a mixed man; Indonesian/Dutch, and he's just beautiful. A well-built, muscular body, good skin, Indonesian eyes, adorable smile, thick hair, etc... anyway, I think he's just wonderful! ;)
2006-07-18 22:01:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Keira Knightley, Angelina Jolie, Lindsay Lohan, Maria Sharapova, Rachel McAdams.
2006-07-18 20:37:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by miss 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Johnny Depp
2006-07-18 20:31:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by rohanna1965 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Anna Mae Wong know as the most photographed face in her time 1930's to 50's Chinese actress before being asian was really accepted in Hollywood. Began in silent movies and quit acting because she was killed off the films so much and was always sterotyped as the evil Dragon lady type. Very beautiful.
2006-07-18 19:52:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Paris Hilton
2006-07-18 19:41:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Audrey Hepburn, especially in Breakfast At Tiffany's. Check out the DVD cover. Her features are just perfect
In the 21st century... hmmm... I think I really would have to go with Jessica Alba. She is not the most gorgeous (face) looking like Keira Knightley, but Keira is a bit too skinny and she's flat. But Jessica Alba is very pretty and she has curves to die for.
For guys... I don't really like Orlando Bloom and Jesse Metcalfe, but i think they reallly have faces and bodies to die for.
But Thats just me... see ya!
2006-07-18 22:59:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by natalien. 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ever seen? Elisa Bridges. Playmate of the Month, December '94. My reason is because she's the first person that popped in my mind. And i spent a good hour or so looking her up, because i forgot her name.
2006-07-18 20:19:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think of this paragraph sums it up ultimate: On a visit in New Mexico weeks before the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, Adams shot a scene of the Moon becoming above a modest village with snow-lined mountains interior the background, below a dominating black sky. The image is one among his maximum nicely-enjoyed and is termed, Moonrise, Hernandez, New Mexico. The image's recognition replace into in all possibility improved with the aid of Adams's description in his later books of the way it replace into made: the easy on the crosses interior the foreground replace into without postpone fading, and he could desire to no longer locate his exposure meter; in spite of the shown fact that, he remembered the luminance of the Moon, and used it to calculate the right exposure.[40 two][40 3][40 4] Adams's before account[40 5] replace into much less dramatic, stating only that the image replace into made after sundown, with exposure desperate employing his Weston grasp meter.[40 six] in spite of the shown fact that the exposure replace into genuinely desperate, the foreground replace into underexposed, the highlights interior the clouds have been particularly dense, and the unfavourable proved complicated to print.[40 seven] The preliminary booklet of Moonrise replace into in U.S. digicam 1943 annual, after being chosen with the aid of the "image choose" for U.S. digicam, Edward Steichen.[40 8] This gave Moonrise an aim industry before its first formal exhibition on the Museum of modern artwork in 1944.[40 9] Over almost 40 years, Adams re-interpreted the image, his maximum usual with the aid of a techniques, employing the latest darkroom kit at his disposal, making over a million,3 hundred unique prints, maximum in sixteen? with the aid of 20? format.[50] lots of the prints have been made interior the Seventies, ultimately giving Adams financial independence from advertisement initiatives. the entire fee of those unique prints exceeds $25,000,000;[fifty one] the optimum fee paid for a single print reached $609,six hundred at Sotheby's manhattan public sale in 2006. taken from wikipedia. there is no such element as a appropriate image.
2016-11-02 08:05:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by belschner 4
·
0⤊
0⤋