English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

My son was the victim of "Aggrevated Racial Harassment" when the case came to trial the council for defence introduced a statement written by our Housing Association. This stated that my son was the subject of an Anti-Social behaviour Order it also inferred we had been evicted from our home. As we were in the witness suite the first we knew about this was when the prosecutor came down to say that she thought we ought to agree to let the accused be bound over rather than go to trial- we informed the prosecutor that this was not true but having been discredited already she still advised us to accept this ruling. Not having been in court to hear exactly what was said I obtained the Official Transcript of the case. I have it in writing that the judge was led to believe these lies from a statement from the Housing Association. The HA eventually admitted writing a statment for the defence-they then claimed both the Judge and prosecutor must have mis-read the contents? Isn't this illegal?

2006-07-18 17:14:27 · 3 answers · asked by elinor1963 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

3 answers

At torn ey ; by definition is one who takes away ones rights an property and is a title of nobility They are also licensed in not the truth but fiction.
This one diminstrated fully

2006-07-18 17:22:41 · answer #1 · answered by Robert F 7 · 1 0

Here are some suggestions for points that you can argue:

1. Son's mental condition cannot be determined by a Housing Association. If decision was made based on that statement alone or if that statement was one of the MAIN reasons, then you can definitely appeal it.

2.If the statement is true, then there should be some kind of disability law that protects you.

3. Obtain your payment history from the Housing Assn.

4. Libel is when a person writes something that YOU CAN PROVE IS UNTRUE and the thing they wrote did monetary (money) damage to you or put your job in jeopardy. That's the pursuit of happiness part of the Preamble to the Constitution. It is saying that you have a right to pursue work and a place to live.

2006-07-18 19:15:19 · answer #2 · answered by mg 3 · 1 0

A statement filed in court is not subject to defamation laws with few exceptions. If something like that was filed, it is up to the party that filed to prove their allegations and they are subject to cross-examination.

2006-07-18 18:52:47 · answer #3 · answered by Angela B 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers