My son was the victim of "Aggrevated Racial Harassment" when the case came to trial the council for defence introduced a statement written by our Housing Association. This stated that my son was the subject of an Anti-Social behaviour Order it also inferred we had been evicted from our home. As we were in the witness suite the first we knew about this was when the prosecutor came down to say that she thought we ought to agree to let the accused be bound over rather than go to trial- we informed the prosecutor that this was not true but having been discredited already she still advised us to accept this ruling. Not having been in court to hear exactly what was said I obtained the Official Transcript of the case. I have it in writing that the judge was led to believe these lies from a statement from the Housing Association. The HA eventually admitted writing a statment for the defence-they then claimed both the Judge and prosecutor must have mis-read the contents? Isn't this illegal?
2006-07-18
17:14:27
·
3 answers
·
asked by
elinor1963
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics