Sadly, some people are so blinded by their hatred of President Bush, they feel compelled to oppose everything he says, no matter the evidence.
Quite often the same people who pose these elaborate conspiracy theories and credit them to Bush, in the next breath proclaim him an idiot. Now really, he can't be both can he?
Liberals tend to think with their heart, rather than with their head. They can't believe that reasonable people could possibly have disagreed with them in the 2000 election, so thee choose to believe that Bush stole the election. (He didn't. Google "Florida Ballot Project") If the recount that Gore had requested had been allowed to proceed, Bush would still have won. Some people can't accept that though, and it drives their anger.
2006-07-18 17:20:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jay S 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
There is one controversy..There is no "AL Qaeda"
No one had heard this name in muslim world..
If by alqaeda you mean islamist rebels,there is no evidence to prove that they did..
That means,if bin laden gets a fair trial in US he can very well get "not guilty" verdict..
Are the guys who sell the myth that the no fly zone over pentagon had no air defence system at place(first plane hit wtc tower at 8:46 am and the the third plane hit pentagon at 9:37am),and president bush preferred to sit with kids when attacks on 9/11 were happening guilty or some guy who is sitting on some remote mountain cave (say afghanistan)
..
There are a lot of murky things..in a few years,the real story would be know and kids would labell people who believe this story naive !
2006-07-18 21:53:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ali 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
It is allot more than what you see on TV. Its more the series of anomalies that happened. For the first time a modern skyscraper came down because of fire ( at terminal velocity I might add) This happen to WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7. The owner of the trade center even said in an interview "the order was given to pull the building" (building 7) pull is a demo trade term for take down or implode. I believe Osama never took credit for 9/11. Take a look at the documentary Loose Change, although not 100% accurate this raises allot of questions. What bothers me most is the silence of big media not to report the facts, these facts would make most Americans head spin.
2006-07-19 04:15:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Waas up 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well, no one can explain how those planes took off from Boston Logan and no one went after them. (got into the airspace).
Why did it take too long to send fighter jets after them?
The damage was already done by the time they sent them out.
There is a "theory" circulating now that says the steel beams were too weak to hold the impact of the planes and that's what caused them to collapse. I don't think that had anything to do with the whole thing. It's just a way of focusing off who was really responsible for it.
2006-07-19 08:41:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Big Bear 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I have heard of the theory's even some Arab groups said anything planned out that WELL WAS NOT done by an Arab. I think people believe it was done by The U.S.. S. government, I don't know what could be the reason behind it
2006-07-18 17:20:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by magpie 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
These "controversies" are started by same people who say we never ever landed on the moon and that aliens are hiding out in Roswell.
2006-07-18 19:47:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Angela B 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Did Bush know anything about it and did nothing to prevent the attacks? (Much like FDR and Pearl Harbor)
2006-07-18 17:18:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
You can't keep a determined idiot quiet..
You can't keep a determined idiot from listening..
And these idiots create controversy and keep it alive..
2006-07-18 17:26:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋