English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

what do you prefer..... please give many reasons and explanasions

2006-07-18 16:27:40 · 8 answers · asked by ballaplaya035 1 in Health Men's Health

8 answers

OK, I have had both & would HAVE to say circumsized. Natural ones smell funny, are gross when you have to deal with the skin folding back & just look plain UGLY. Circ'ed ones are much cleaner & nicer to look at. & feel better too...

2006-07-18 16:30:22 · answer #1 · answered by Dasher 5 · 0 0

How many times will people ask the same question?

It all comes down to good hygiene -- whether you're cut or not, make sure it's clean!

2006-07-18 23:33:40 · answer #2 · answered by HearKat 7 · 0 0

Either is fine with me...although I have only been with one that was not. He seemed more sensitive down there. Also, it feels nice with that bit of extra skin.

2006-07-18 23:30:52 · answer #3 · answered by maat13101 5 · 0 0

personally i like a guy circumcised.
not that uncircumcised guys are dirty, but to me it is just not as clean. and i like the look better. nothing wrong with not getting cut though...it's a personal choice that you have to make for you...not for what some women think.

2006-07-18 23:30:01 · answer #4 · answered by purple dove 5 · 0 0

Circumsized!!

This guy I met told me he wasn't and it seriously grossed me out to the point I did not want anything to do with him after that.

They look nasty and they are so dirty. Eww.

2006-07-18 23:36:33 · answer #5 · answered by Whatever 5 · 0 0

well im gay so i can answer, circumsised......due to the fact its cleaner and it looks better soft.

2006-07-19 00:16:10 · answer #6 · answered by animedeamon69 1 · 0 0

not!
it turns me on when I get to push back the skin to have the head exposed, i love that

2006-07-18 23:30:20 · answer #7 · answered by cutiepie81289 7 · 0 0

either way

2006-07-19 00:44:35 · answer #8 · answered by cmac 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers