OK, I have had both & would HAVE to say circumsized. Natural ones smell funny, are gross when you have to deal with the skin folding back & just look plain UGLY. Circ'ed ones are much cleaner & nicer to look at. & feel better too...
2006-07-18 16:30:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dasher 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
How many times will people ask the same question?
It all comes down to good hygiene -- whether you're cut or not, make sure it's clean!
2006-07-18 23:33:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by HearKat 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Either is fine with me...although I have only been with one that was not. He seemed more sensitive down there. Also, it feels nice with that bit of extra skin.
2006-07-18 23:30:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by maat13101 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
personally i like a guy circumcised.
not that uncircumcised guys are dirty, but to me it is just not as clean. and i like the look better. nothing wrong with not getting cut though...it's a personal choice that you have to make for you...not for what some women think.
2006-07-18 23:30:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by purple dove 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Circumsized!!
This guy I met told me he wasn't and it seriously grossed me out to the point I did not want anything to do with him after that.
They look nasty and they are so dirty. Eww.
2006-07-18 23:36:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Whatever 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
well im gay so i can answer, circumsised......due to the fact its cleaner and it looks better soft.
2006-07-19 00:16:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by animedeamon69 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
not!
it turns me on when I get to push back the skin to have the head exposed, i love that
2006-07-18 23:30:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by cutiepie81289 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
either way
2006-07-19 00:44:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by cmac 3
·
0⤊
0⤋