Should We Test Presidential Candidates before they run for Election?

Question

Not a multiple Choice Questions.

Maybe Test them on Government, Economics, and If they UNDERSTAND and are familure with the Costitution.

Answer 1

I think Presidential candidates are scrutinized enough, we REALLY need to work on the nut-jobs elected the House and Senate, who often go un-noticed until they open their amazingly ignorant pie-holes.

Like the Speaker of the House once said, he spends too much time teaching basics of economics to people who are running the various budgeting/appropriations committies.

Answer 2

no, who could design a fair test. the President is the head of a team of advisers, he picks the team and then relies on their expertise. don't you think that the media scrutiny is enough of a test for anyone.

there is not many people who are willing to put them selves under that microscope to get elected to a job that pays less than most CEO's make a year

no test to be president,

Answer 3

it will be a mandated requirment, that the fellow operating for the workplace of President, accept VSA try or Poly. also an finished B.I. for good secret Clearance. this may separate the genuine candidate from those like Obama.

Answer 4

How about testing them before elections & randomly after being elected.

Steroids
Alcohol
Drugs
IQ
Lying
Sexual disorders

Answer 5

Maybe we should just improve the education system. That might make your question a little more intelligent.

Good thought, though.

Answer 6

Let's hope they're not testing you on spelling or using the spell check.

Answer 7

They should take a lie detector test .

Answer 8

aren't most exmilitary, lawyers, and the like? shouldn't that be test enough?

Answer 9

that good thinking maybe you becoming president and you Good one too