English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

BECAUSE FOR AMERICA, WHEN ANYTHING HAS TO DO WITH JEWS: DEMOCRACY DOESN'T EXZIST IN THEIR VOCABULARY ANY MORE ;)

THE AMERICAN AND ISREAL GOVERNMENT ONLY USE THE WORD democracy WHEN ITS FOR THEIR OWN GOOD..OTHERWISE: "DEMOCRACY??? WHAT DOES THAT MEAN??"

2006-07-18 13:44:08 · answer #1 · answered by freindly asian 1 · 0 2

That's an interesting question. The short answer is that the US does not recognize terrorist organizations as 'governments'. The US has stated (even before the election) that unless a government denounces terrorism, and the violence that stems from terrorism, they would not recognize the legitimacy of that government. The long answer would require someone in the State Department. You're free to make the request to the State Department. Start with www.whitehouse.gov.

2006-07-18 13:32:05 · answer #2 · answered by Ice 6 · 0 0

I think this is a case of 'be careful what you wish for, you might just get it'. It is the perfect irony, isn't it? Freedom to vote means freedom to disagree.

I think the US won't accept HAMAS because of the US support for the state of Israel and HAMAS's refusal to accept Israel's right to exist. Sooner or later everyone will have to get round the table and work it out - the alternative is unthinkable.

2006-07-18 13:32:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Our preference is for a democratically elected government. But that has no bearing on whether or not we are going to lay down and surrendure to a bunch of terrorists merely because some ignorant voters voted them into office.

Have you not read ANY history? Hitler came to power via an election. Does that legitimize the things his regime later did?

2006-07-18 13:29:59 · answer #4 · answered by TheSlayor 5 · 0 0

genuinely, Hitler wasn't initially elected. He replace into appointed chancellor in 1933. If I examine wikipedia suitable, Nazis have been the biggest social gathering represented interior the Reichstag yet no longer maximum human beings on the time. They then used the burning of the Reichstag development as a marketing campaign platform to to do away with the communists and took over. i like Godwin's regulation tho, I hadn't heard of it. Bush by no potential supported democracy. Democracy potential rule with the aid of the human beings, or government with the uncoerced consent of the ruled. authentic, we many times think of it potential elections and that's sometimes an imperative section. In occupied Palestine, the Israeli protection stress regulations the human beings of Palestine. Like maximum of our elected representatives, no member of the Bush regime somewhat needs to unfastened Palestine. The corporation of helping democracy is the two cynical propaganda meant for the intake of the yank public, or some twisted concept that bringing democracy to the middle East could make for happy, contented, neat and sparkling and civilized, grateful u.s.-loving natives residing in peace component-with the aid of-component with Israel. The founders of Israel have been terrorists, a number of them like Yitzhak Shamir and Menachim start up formally precise terrorists and in all possibility in charge for plenty extra deaths of "harmless civilians" (human beings) than Hamas, even counting all the Palestinians killed interior the inter-factional struggling with with the aid of Hamas. Shamir made an alliance with the Italian fascists in WWII against the British and tried to make an alliance with the Nazis (i do no longer think of it is a assessment that proves Godwin's regulation). With acts of terrorism observed with the aid of some important massacres, the Zionists/Israelis expelled maximum human beings of the human beings (maximum human beings interior what became "greenline" Israel have been Arabs previous to 1948) previous to forming a "Jewish democracy". Calling into question what a democracy somewhat is. i'm not sure the objection to terrorism is genuinely moot yet certainly the variations are blurry.

2016-11-02 07:42:53 · answer #5 · answered by sikorski 4 · 0 0

Contrary to W's position, democracy is not primary. Freedom is. Democracy say a big enough mob can elect Hitler (or HAMAS).

2006-07-18 14:23:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well, if Hamas wasnt a "Terrorist Government" bent on destroying Isreal, then we probably WOULD acknowledge them...

But, they have been a terrorist organization from way back when, and they will continue to be that way, and we just dont deal with Terrorists!

I wish you well..

Jesse

2006-07-18 13:39:41 · answer #7 · answered by x 7 · 0 0

Could it be because HAMAS is a terrorist organization much like Bin Ladens gang? Could it be because one of their stated goals is the total destruction of a neighboring country? Should we support them? NOPE, we should bomb the crap out of em. Remember how they cheered on 9-11?

2006-07-18 13:29:30 · answer #8 · answered by InnerCircle 4 · 0 0

First of all Palenstine has no history or reason to exist. Second Hamas is nothing more than a terrorist group in suits.

2006-07-18 13:29:24 · answer #9 · answered by ML 5 · 0 0

Because Hamas is a terrorist organization bent on destroying Israel's existence. They refused to stop the violence. Hitler was democratically elected, too.

2006-07-18 13:28:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding on what to have for dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.

-Attributed to Benjamin Franklin

2006-07-18 13:28:24 · answer #11 · answered by nhzero 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers