English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-18 13:08:43 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Earth Sciences & Geology

17 answers

Man originated from earlier primates in eastern Africa. The big step in their evolution is the drying of eastern Africa about 4 million years ago. When the jungles died and separated, what would become man developed a locking knee joint. This enabled them to walk much farther (and endurance run) to cover more ground and obtain more resources, putting them at a distinct advantage to other primates. If you don't believe me, try walking around without locking your knee, it's hard and taxing.

This adaptation allowed for the development of many other things that we've come to love: our large heads and brains (when we were strictly bipedal, we free up our hands for projects, and this favors big brains), short rib cage (for flexibility), and big butts (something has to give you balance when you don't have a tail).

This climate change occurred when New Guinea moved in the way of a prominent current that brought warm, moist water to east Africa. Over time, these newly smart, adapted primates radiated out of Africa and to the rest of the world. See links below for more info.

2006-07-18 13:10:24 · answer #1 · answered by QFL 24-7 6 · 3 0

The origin of man is the southern region of Africa. Science has traced, through research of the human genome, carbon dating and good old fashion anthropology, that not only did man come out of Africa but that every single race of human being is a descendant of those homosapiens. In other words we all come from black or ebony people. Even Jesus was a black man but everyone knew that. National Geographic did an awesome documentary on this very topic.

2006-07-18 13:21:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Your in Deepshit man the holy folk are gonna make you pay for asking that question.

Man evolved from the monkey which evolved from.................. single celled mass

I tend to disagree with the world having being created in 7 days 5000 ears ago

2006-07-18 13:20:39 · answer #3 · answered by Whodaman 4 · 0 0

Africa,The Summ or Cumm Tribe there today,Australia,Aborigines,South Asia,Hindi's India,then they split,half to Europe,other half to China,Mongols,Russian,Inuit,North American Indians,to the tip of South America.

Dr.Spencer Wells.Geneticist See We Are All Related,Weather you Like it or Not,Only 1 Species of Homo Sapien!

2006-07-18 13:32:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

How would we really know?

"Some piously record 'In the beginning God,' but I say in the beginning hydrogen." This pompous claim of crass materialism challenging the creative work of God by astronomer Harlow Shapley reflects the quandary students face today in our public and private schools. Many students, for example, have been required to watch and discuss the 13-part television series "Cosmos" featuring one of Shapley's best known students, Carl Sagan. In the first sentence of his book Cosmos (which is meant to supplement the television series), Sagan confidently declared in capital letters that "THE COSMOS IS ALL THAT IS OR EVER WAS OR EVER WILL BE." Sagan assures us that "we humans are the products of a long series of biological accidents" and concludes that all of our human traits -- loves and hates, passions and despairs, tenderness and aggression are simply the result of "minor accidents in our immensely long evolutionary history." Sagan believes that "men may not be the dreams of the gods, but rather that the gods are the dreams of men." In an interview published in the St. Louis Globe-Democrat (Oct. 6, 1980), Sagan was asked to comment on his view of the future of man. Sagan replied:

"I feel in order to survive we someday must be able to give up our allegiance to our nation, our religion, our race and economic group and think of ourselves more as just a temporary form of life..."

We hear much about that great "wall of separation" that the framers of our Constitution were supposed to have erected to protect us from state-mandated religion. But are we to also be protected from state-mandated instruction in evolutionary beliefs and speculations that threaten to undermine the religious beliefs of many of our students? Evolution is a jealous god that neither seeks nor welcomes divine intervention. Julian Huxley, one of evolution's most vocal champions, declared that "the whole of reality is evolution -- a single process of self transformation." In this view there can be nothing above or outside of evolution, and thus the origin of religion itself is merely a minor blip in the recent evolutionary history of the universe. Even so, evolutionists often argue that there is nothing incompatible between religion and evolution as long as each confines itself to its own legitimate domain. But what limits can be set for a natural process that claims to be nothing less than the whole of reality?

2006-07-18 13:11:56 · answer #5 · answered by Justsyd 7 · 0 1

why don't you read the Origin of Spiecies and the Descent of Man, by charles darwin

2006-07-18 15:39:07 · answer #6 · answered by CLBH 3 · 0 0

It's long and convoluted but basically we evolved from nothing. You might try Isaac Asimov's "Beginnings" for the scientific explanation of it. If you are religious, then you can consult the great works of whatever religion you are part of.

2006-07-18 13:13:03 · answer #7 · answered by sat 2 · 0 1

Big Bang

2006-07-18 13:10:56 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Oslo, Norway, contrary to popular opinion.

2006-07-24 18:04:45 · answer #9 · answered by Randy L 2 · 0 1

God. I think someone had to create us. No life on any other planets that we know of so far so the God theory still holds stronger then ever.

2006-07-18 13:11:49 · answer #10 · answered by newyorkchess2005 2 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers