First of all, every woman respose to this question is the same answer because they are brainwashed that way to believe it (IF THE MAN was resposible for his part in conception, PAID HIS SUPPORT??/THAT ACCOUNTS FOR ONLY 7 % OF THE MONEY SHE GETS SO ENOUGH OF THAT)
Force them to get jobs like the system says they are required to do, and stop the wavers so they don't have to get trained and employed., so they can support themselves. it says 5 yrs of aid but most just pop another baby to keep the free money coming in.
I say this because i pay the system $500.00 for my daughter whom i haven't seen for 5 yrs and they(the workers)don't care unless i miss a payment then they don't care about my visitation needs with my child at all. educating them will not help, if it did there wouldn't be 14 yr olds having babies to get out of mom's house which is what the "training education" told them they would get from the system if they did.
get a clue the way to stop this is to tell them 1 child ok, 2 get a job, 3 have a job, 4 lose benefits till get a job, then only get them for 2 more years. just a thought
Example fact : the girl next door to me has 5 children is 20 yrs old has no skills other that how to make a baby and gets $1500 a month(about how much i get to bust my hump 40 hours a week for the whole month but i have to pay taxes on it and get no tax credit) to support her children, yet is on the porch when i go to bed and when i get up to go to work at 430 am drinking/partying and she lives with her parents(with her boyfriend) and sleeps all day. Guess who takes care of the kids??// grandma. so we see what is wrong with the system??? how to fix it is for the system to not be run by (sorry) woman, because they are too soft about forcing the motherfkrrrrrrrrrrs to get jobs.
And we all know that for the FATHER OF THE CHILD to have joint-custody anywhere is the U.S. He has to pay a lawyer $100,000.00 to get to spent every other weekend with the child, but all she has to do is say waaaaaaa and she's in the the D.A.'s pocket taking her thru the whole court process from begining to end for free, because it generates money for them if the mother has the baby. If the father has the baby custody he works to keep it, and doesn't require the SYSTEM. so the state county and city get NOTHING! it's how the corrupt system supports it christmas parties.
2006-07-18 11:26:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mr D 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Wow...I think you are going to get some static in regards to this question!!!
But I see what you are saying. I thik education is always the best option. We can't forget though that a lot of these women are forced to seek government aid because the fathers don't help them raise the kid. I am very against such public aid because I feel that my taxed dollars are going to feed and take care of other people's irresponsabilities. However, I know there is an exception to every rule and that there are many women out there (married or unmarried) who are going through hard times and thus need temporary financial help. I still do not agree, but...it makes it a little easier to swollow if you think along these lines!
2006-07-18 11:27:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am a mother of two boys and I am only 22 I didn't think of public aid when I was younger and I still don't I have taken care of my kids from day one by myself with help from my mom. I was 17 when I had my first and I graduated high school and attending college, which I will graduate from in may then I will start an organization helping other young parents. Maybe we should do anything to the women but instead to the dead beat dads that don't help the women out. Maybe if there were more men that would take care of their RESPONSIBILITIES women wouldn't need to ask for help.
2006-07-18 11:17:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by nastassjacruz 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
If father's would pay a decent amount of child support or child support at all in most cases I don't think we would have so many problems. Although true, many women should be sterilized by now or at least on some major form of birth control such as an IUD but let's not leave the men out of the picture. I really don't believe that women are going around having more babies just to get more welfare assistance.
2006-07-18 11:14:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by reese172003 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
So if they were married and collecting public aid that would be okay would it? Also, perhaps they would not need public aid if the males involved in the child's conception paid their child support. Of course, the argument you make is ridiculous anyway since there is nothing wrong with public aid and in fact we should have more of it available in this country!
2006-07-18 11:05:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Redshift Agenda 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
what woman would have a bunch of babies just to get public aid,where are the fathers and the women may not belive in abortion so they are stuck taking care of the kids most of their life all the men do is run away and not take care of the kids.
2006-07-18 12:15:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by little miss 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Check out the price of baby formula, then check out the price of
diapers. I really don't think what you're asking is the case.
Public aid never matches the true cost of these items.
2006-07-18 11:05:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Calee 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Remember - it takes two to Tango! The guys who think it's macho to make babies and then make tracks should be tracked down and made to re-pay the state the money the state paid out for their kids!
2006-07-18 11:08:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by TLBFH 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Can you find one woman like this? Find one and then ask the question. In the meantime, what about all the people having babies to get the child tax credit?
2006-07-18 11:12:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Alan L 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Educate them. I am a single mom of two boys....one which is Autistic. When they were young I went to school and now I fully support them with little help from there Dad.
2006-07-18 11:04:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋