I cannot say that I am completely happy with all the decisions Bush has made in his presidency, but I would definetely be more unhappy with the beliefs and opinions Kerry holds to. I cannot support Kerry because I disagree with his beliefs and opinions more than I do with Bush's beliefs and opinions.
2006-07-18 10:22:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by rockinout 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I have always been an advocate for Bush. I think he got a bad rap with the Iraq issues early in his presidency. I feel that the recent statements he's made have just backed up the fact that he is NOT going to take any crap from anyone. He doesn't back down, and he certainly isn't going to let radicals or communists' succeed in taking control of anything! I love what he said to Blair, and I'm more convinced that he's been right all along. I believe, in the future, GWB will be highly respected as a president that had his country's best interest in mind. One thing I learned in the nine years I lived in Texas; they don't take anyone's sh!t.
2006-07-18 10:28:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by carolinagrl 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You've go to be kidding! From peace and prosperity under Clinton to war and bankruptcy under Bush. And for the people that are happy I hope you are all veterans of Iraq or your children and grandchildren are, and are spilling their blood there for all your happiness because none of the Bush clan is. They sure know how to stay away from all that happiness.
To Dog Mama, the Republicans under the direction of Richard Nixon lost VietNam. Under Eisenhower, we fought to a statemate in Korea, and now we are losing in the war on terror. Oh, remember when that great RepubliTURD, Ronald Reagan, ran from Lebenon after over 300 Americans were killed by Hezbollah. The start of the terrorism against America. It was a republiTurd that ran and lost the wars America has lost, not liberals or Democrates. WW! and WW2 were won by the Democrates. The Republicans of the time wanted to stay home and hide from Americas enemies. George W. Bush is nothing more than a yellow-bellied, chicken-sh*t coward that made sure he didn't serve in combat in Viet Nam. I too am a Viet Nam vet. George sure kept the skys of Texas safe during that war. Not one Viet Cong flew over Texas and attacked it. I guess he would be your hero.
2006-07-18 10:30:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Pop D 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, we're better off now than under clinton.
clinton lied, wasted the economic boom of the internet, screwed the economy, only produced a surplus on paper, trashed the military and intelligence communities to the extent we were attacked, wh0red out the white house, installed extremist activist judges, sold military secrets to the chinese, gave the north koreans nukes, disgraced the office of the president and the country.
Bush has repaired the economy the best anyone could following clintons irresponsibility and the blow 911 gave it. He quit bowing down to the nuts in france, venezuela, n korea and the useless nations. He is bringing the courts back to the center from the extreme left. Despite the lies from democrats, he is honorable.
2006-07-18 10:39:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by RockHunter 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm very happy with George. Having watched the threat of islamic fascism growing steadily since the 70's, I'm thrilled that we finally have someone in the White House who is willing to do something about it. I love the way he doesn't give a rat's *ss about public opinion and tries to tackle subjects other politicians would never dare to touch: like the third rail of American politics, Social Security reform and the ethical ramifications of cloning and stem cell research.
2006-07-18 10:26:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by caesar x 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Love our President. He doesn't run from the terrorist like the liberal left would do. He deals with trouble when it happens, doesn't wait for a new administration to come in to deal with it. He is a real American Hero. If the Republicans stay in office, then we WILL win this war. If the Democrats win, we will loose like we did in Vietnam, and be viewed a weak. Loosing in Vietnam is why we were seen as an easy mark for the terrorist nations. Damn Liberals.
2006-07-18 10:25:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dog Mama 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
HELL NO! Bush sucks as a president and as a person. When voting I look for a candidate who is not a crack cocaine addict. I also like the candidate not to be a C minus student and not related to jackass Bush family.
2006-07-18 10:22:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by a_rajalonghorn 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO NO NO I cannot stand Bush. What I look for is someone who cares about peoples individual rights, wants whats best for our country, and cares more about whats going on here at home and less about whats going on in other country's that doesn't even concern us to begin with.
2006-07-18 10:35:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by The Prez. 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm happy with Bush. He's pretty much done what he set out to do. I am disappointed with some of his decisions, however. Waging a war on terror without securing our borders makes no sense...
2006-07-18 10:24:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by trc_6111 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush makes decisions based on how well the presenter of it puts forth the argument.
When he hasd to think on his own, he is lost.
A president should be a leader, not a signpost pointing the direction.
A president should inspire with confidence, not make you cringe with embarrassment.
2006-07-18 10:24:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋