in a rating how would u rating Pink Floyds Ummagumma album 10 being brill and 1 being crap?

Answer 1

I would rate it a 10. It features, Roger Water, David Gilmour, Richard Wright, and Nick Mason, displaying their talent individually. I know David Gilmour did The Narrow Way Pts 1 - 3, (which 3 is my favorite on the album) but I don't quite remember who did the rest, although one quick listen would tell me. Another reason I'd rate it a 10 is because you can hear the progression of the band, you can tell how the sound was changing after Syd Barret. You can tell how they were leaning more towards the DOTM sound. All Pink Floyd albums are great too. Just thought I'd throw that in.

Answer 2

That is the one album I could never get into. The live stuff is okay, but the studio stuff is a little self-absorbed. By way of comparison, I give Dark Side a 10, Atom Heart Mother a 3, Piper at the Gates at Dawn a 9, and the Final Cut a 1.

Final score for Ummagumma--2.

Answer 3

Ummagumma was, by their own admission,a bit of a self indulgent experiment..but a necessary one in terms of exploring their music craft and instrumentation. A large proportion of the Umagumma sessions were left out..things like a big rubber band being stretched, then played like a bass..a ruler being twanged at different lengths. They originally wanted to record unconventional sounds in a musical way. The album I think was good overall, but was more of a band 'discovering' their identity. Granchester meadows is a chill out acoustic classic. 7/10

Answer 4

5. I'm a late Floydy. There are definitely 2 types. All with the same common love of their music though. Sad about Syd Barratt.

Answer 5

I rate all the Floyd's oeuvre 10.

Answer 6

anything pink floyd is a ten

Answer 7

give me pipers at the gate of dawn anyday?

Answer 8

9; "the wall" was better i thought

Answer 9

-1 , That count ..? How they made money i will never know .... Total bollocks.

Answer 10

TEN