Micheal Jackson was found innocent and i really think he got off the hook for who he is and hes so rich and ect. I think he really did molest the kids and got away with it. I think hes guilty!! What do yall think?
2006-07-18 07:59:30 · 19 answers · asked by SCSA 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Give your thoughts....
2006-07-18 08:03:41 · update #1
To answer your question chad, i do think he might have touched the boys and done bad things with them but sometimes these people expand the truth and there making it like he rapes every boy that came into his house. I can agree that he has a sick mind however.
Micheal Jackson, in my opinion, should do some jail time for all the stuff he has done. And so should some of the parents charging m.j. because the told many lies under oath. He really shouldn't even be having little boys over at his house!
Grown men shouldn't sleep with younger children. He might be gay.... But i do think he has touched some boys and drugged them. He has also let them do many under aged things that is bad. I think he might have got away with who he is. But if not it had to have helped a bit. I mean a rich man who is weird and likes boys, yeah looks like that would help charging him with rape and that stuff...
I also think that he should start dating women again! One things for sure though... He needs counseling! And mental help. I think his children might get taken away from him. Might... but this man is weird and psycho! He needs to get away from little boys and start living in the real world and he dosnt need to mess around with minors. I think he needs a re-trial. Maybe or maybe not..
Yes, and yes. He should be guilty and someone needs to slap the sense in him. Hope this helps chad!
-Hayley Wyles =)
2006-07-18 08:58:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a double edged sword really. I think he did molest those boys, but at the same time, the families of the kids were as corrupt as he is ill. It's kind of like boy cried wolf - the mother of the last case ran scams all through her kids' childhood, even making them part of her grifts - to where even her son's bout with cancer didn't slow that down. So now that her son was molested by Jackson, even if he did do it, the mother's credibility in turn hurt the boy's case.
2006-07-18 08:13:34 · answer #2 · answered by Pask 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
While I think it would be impossible for anyone to say that Michael fits in with the normal everyday crowd, I have no reason to believe that he actually molested children.
It's so easy to grab the wealthy weird person and quickly assume that since they are wealthy, they can get away with anything and because they are strange, they obviously do illegal acts against children.
While his weirdness (the peter pan syndrome) would put him closer to children and thus it is easier to believe that he has done this, I believe that he is innocent of these charges and only guilty of being odd.
Hope that this helps.
Buddhadan
2006-07-18 08:09:10 · answer #3 · answered by buddhadan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Michael Jackson gives a new meaning to the term, "Pedophile"! Who else do you know would go to the extreme of putting a freakin amusement park (among other things) up on their lawn to entice children?
Yes! He's guilty & he should have been locked up and the key thrown away! But, instead he's out living a normal life, (well, normal for him) in society!
The system sucks, if you have money, you can get out of anything.......
Look at O.J. Simpson brutally murdering his wife & friend, his wallet talked him out of that charge as well!!!
2006-07-19 02:22:28 · answer #4 · answered by Katz 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
With out a doubt he molested those kids and probably more. Molesters are very carefull about who they choose and he chose families that are more easily persuaded. He deserves to be in jail and all of the people who still support him really need a reality check.
GROWN MEN DO NOT SLEEP WITH OTHER PEOPLES CHILDREN....
2006-07-18 08:15:52 · answer #5 · answered by SunshineSparkles1976 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't think he did. I think he's merely trying to recover the youth that was stolen from him by his father, who drove his sons to perform and make money for him. He's obviously not normal, but I really think in his mind he was just having a sleep over with his buddies. Remember, little boys think girls are "yucky" - that doesn't necessarily mean that they're homosexuals. Any sexual activity I bet he had with himself, and he who has a free hand can cast the first stone!
2006-07-20 02:11:00 · answer #6 · answered by Tim D 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes and Yes
2006-07-18 08:03:04 · answer #7 · answered by 4 strings 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he molested the first one but this one I don't know. I think he is an easy target. But you know once a child molester always a child molester.
2006-07-19 03:53:45 · answer #8 · answered by quizqueen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He probably did not abuse them, maybe he molested them, which in my opinion is as bad. I do believe his fame and money had a lot to do with his "not guilty" status.
2006-07-18 08:07:14 · answer #9 · answered by mono_0 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think he molested the children.
I do think he's odd and has problems.
I think maybe he thought of children in a sexual way.
Possibly molested any of them.
I don't think he ever raped any of them though.
2006-07-18 17:21:52 · answer #10 · answered by xxx 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋