George Bush opinions???

Question

What do u think about George Bush as a president? r u pro, con, or u dont really care?

Answer 1

He's created a large number of widows, left a bunch of children without a father, has wasted a ton of money on a no-win war which is little more than a vendetta on his part, and has proven to be one of the truly great leaders of this country. Look at what he's done to keep the population down by insuring that people are getting killed in Iraq!! And let's not forget how he's managed to take a balanced budget and turn it into a massive deficit. With any luck at all, we might just survive his administration - then we can get a real leader in charge.

Answer 2

George W. Bush is the worst President ever to serve in this country. If he were the leader/president of a developing nation, his government would have been overthrown by now.

Answer 3

Pro Bush - that doesn't mean that I don't agree with some of his stances, like immigration.

I'm pro-war as I believe fighting terrorists and toppling oppressive regimes over there is better than fighting terrorists here. A recent article states that the Sunni sect in Iraq now doesn't want the US to leave Iraq - that leaves Democrats and the Terrorists on the lists demanding the US leaves Iraq. :-)

Answer 4

Pro George! My hero.

Answer 5

He is a very dangerous man. Sometimes, I think he is worse than Hitler, who was a very popular leader in Germany. If anything, before WWII, Hitler probably did more for his country than Bush has. Hitler gave his people national pride, cars, the autobahn, and jobs.

Perhaps you think I have gone too far, but people asked why the Germans didn't stop Hitler. When are we going to have the guts to challenge Bush?

Answer 6

Calling heads of state pygmies, labeling whole countries as evil, denigrating powerful European allies as irrelevant -- these types of crude insensitivities can do our great nation no good. We may have massive military might, but we cannot fight a global war on terrorism alone. We need the cooperation and friendship of our time-honored allies as well as the newer found friends whom we can attract with our wealth. Our awesome military machine will do us little good if we suffer another devastating attack on our homeland which severely damages our economy. Our military manpower is already stretched thin and we will need the augmenting support of those nations who can supply troop strength, not just sign letters cheering us on.

The war in Afghanistan has cost us $37 billion so far, yet there is evidence that terrorism may already be starting to regain its hold in that region. We have not found bin Laden, and unless we secure the peace in Afghanistan, the dark dens of terrorism may yet again flourish in that remote and devastated land.

Pakistan as well is at risk of destabilizing forces. This Administration has not finished the first war against terrorism and yet it is eager to embark on another conflict with perils much greater than those in Afghanistan. Is our attention span that short? Have we not learned that after winning the war one must always secure the peace?

And yet we hear little about the aftermath of war in Iraq. In the absence of plans, speculation abroad is rife. Will we seize Iraq's oil fields, becoming an occupying power which controls the price and supply of that nation's oil for the foreseeable future? To whom do we propose to hand the reigns of power after Saddam Hussein?

Will our war inflame the Muslim world resulting in devastating attacks on Israel? Will Israel retaliate with its own nuclear arsenal? Will the Jordanian and Saudi Arabian governments be toppled by radicals, bolstered by Iran which has much closer ties to terrorism than Iraq?

Could a disruption of the world's oil supply lead to a world-wide recession? Has our senselessly bellicose language and our callous disregard of the interests and opinions of other nations increased the global race to join the nuclear club and made proliferation an even more lucrative practice for nations which need the income?

Answer 7

Abraham Lincoln was better, but George Bush isnt bad at all, so im PRO BUSH!!!

Answer 8

He is the worst president in the history of the United States.

Answer 9

He has done somethings I really back and others I am totally against. About what happens with all presidents if people look at issues rather than personalities.

Answer 10

GEORGE W. BUSH IS THE GREATEST PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES AND I DOUBT THERE WILL EVER BE A FINER ONE.

For those who don't like him, this is a free country, which means you are free to leave any time you like....bye bye...