2006-07-18 07:11:15 · 18 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
the rating was done by enviornmentalists!
2006-07-18 07:20:28 · update #1
Yes, his record is the worst. 170 nations of the world met in Kyoto, Japan and every one of them, including the U.S., agreed to reduce green house gas emissions, as it is the worst threat to life. It has caused a major depletion of the ozone layer that protects all life from radiation and has caused both polar ice caps to melt, including the major ice cover of Greenland.
One of the first thing Bush did in 2001 was to back out of the agreement. The U.S. is the only country to have done this.
2006-07-18 07:22:26 · answer #1 · answered by StansPC 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I assume that the unmentioned rating was put out by some lame brain liberal fringe group.
This is a good thing. I want my president to have a low environmental rating. Let's get the vast oil deposits in Alaska and the Continental shelf developed.
The environmentalist can be damned.
2006-07-18 14:13:47 · answer #2 · answered by Answer Man 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, and I believe a lot of that rating can be credited to negative media and unbalanced reporting.
Take a look at the national monument declared in Hawaii to preserve over 140,000 square miles of marine habitat:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/environment/jan-june06/hawaii_06-15.html
Bet you didn't hear anything about this. It wouldn't surprise me, as media coverage was rare.
2006-07-18 14:32:08 · answer #3 · answered by SirCharles 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would have thought FDR would have ranked worse. I mean he did build all those dams and hydroelectric plants. He did boost production in every single manufacturing plant in the us. He did have the military bomb the crap out of whatever moved during the war. I would think that is much worse than anything anyone has done recently....
2006-07-18 14:30:17 · answer #4 · answered by celtfalcon 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He has the worst rating on everything in my book. Especially the worst rating on having any huimanity.
2006-07-18 14:33:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Must have been rated by the same people who blame bush for everything else..
2006-07-18 14:16:57 · answer #6 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow, I base my life on the ratings of a few people instead of thinking for myself....it's soooo much easier, isn't it?
2006-07-18 14:15:39 · answer #7 · answered by lc 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Point being? I guess that puke clinton helped fertilize with all of those bodies of people opposed to him he had buried. The earth is fine, but most of the people suck!
2006-07-18 15:03:39 · answer #8 · answered by Steelers1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
will the bashing ever stop?the man can't be reelected.get off your butt and get your people elected.it will serve your purpose better.that is if you have any purpose other than harrassing the president.
2006-07-18 17:18:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
So, who is doing the rating, and why do you believe him?
2006-07-18 14:15:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋