No, not at all.
2006-07-18 06:50:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by sophers4 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
The negative effect would only occur if the mother has an opposite RH factor than the child. However, if it is the first born and the baby is opposite of the mother, it doesn't matter: the mothers cells wouldn't attack the child. This would only happen with the second child because her cells think the baby is a foreign material.
2006-07-18 06:54:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lady Sardonyx 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the woman is Rh + she will not have an Rh - baby that may have erythroblastosis fetalis. The Rh of the father is of no concern. Pregnancy and transfusions are the only times we worry about Rh.
2006-07-18 07:21:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by ringocox 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the woman is positive for the Rh factor she could develop antibodies against her child if the father was Rh-, and the child was Rh-
2006-07-18 06:51:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by science teacher 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I really do not get the question. Are you talking about the effect on the woman, the man, or the baby?
2006-07-18 07:10:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by dennis_d_wurm 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no only incompatable type matters then antibodies may develop
2006-07-18 06:52:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by joanne m 1
·
0⤊
0⤋