English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

23 answers

Yes. There were too many contradictions between the boy and his family. I was off sick for More or less the whole time the reconstruction trial was aired and watched every pic of it! Sad I know - but when your depressed you'll watch anything! lol.

I can categorically say he didn't do anything, however, he was proven innocent in a court of law, so that's good enough for me.

No I wouldn't leave my son alone with him, but I wouldn't leave my son alone with ANYONE i didn't know famous or not.

And also for the record, if ANYONE, did that to my child, there is NO WAY on this earth I would let them get away with it - not for all the money on this planet!!! didn't the first boy let him for for like 15mil or somet?

The problem with Michael, is that he can't seem to learn from his mistakes, he needs to stop having so many kids round, and stop trusting the media so much like that PLANK from BBC who followed him. That started all the conspiracy off!

Cheers
D*

2006-07-18 06:17:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Yes! There is NO evidence what so ever of the crime. Would you let your child sleep in the same bed as any stranger? No way! But the child's mom let him sleep there; she was setting Michael up! This isn't the first time that this family has attempted to get money without reason. The fact that they said they'd take $14 million to keep quiet proves that they are complete liars.

Additionally, to all those people that said he should be put in jail for holding his child out of the window: He was not doing it in a frightening or threatening way, he was proud and simply showing his beloved son to the crowds.

And to that person who said he should be put in jail for having his own theme park: You seem like the one who has problems! It's not illegal to own a theme park! Do you think that Walt Disney and the creator of Six Flags should be put in jail?

2006-07-19 02:59:41 · answer #2 · answered by 5 · 1 0

Yes.

Anyone who thinks otherwise is a sucker and have been conned by the extortionists.

There you go.

He is innocent and a victim of a conspiracy.

Would you accept $14m for your silence if you were Jordy Chandlers parents and you really believed Michael was guilty? Of course not. If your child was sexually abused by an adult you would want to see that adults *** rot in hell. NO AMOUNT OF MONEY COULD BUY ME.

I rest my case.

2006-07-18 13:14:34 · answer #3 · answered by super_star 4 · 0 0

The verdict was possibly correct on the evidence presented but there is no doubt at all that he is any number of sandwiches short of a picnic.

2006-07-19 12:41:13 · answer #4 · answered by geoff t 4 · 0 0

Yes! There was no evidence and the moms were proven to have done shady things for money! Also the kids kept changing their stories! The whole case had more holes in it than a colander!!

♥♥We Love You Michael!!!!♥♥

2006-07-18 13:13:02 · answer #5 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 0 0

it was well known he gave kids alcohol. his team even said that but he got off. He also admitted he slept with the kids in the same room. Now call me old fashion but that is not right. They were not even his kids. it seems in the good old USofA that money talks and sex offenders walk.
I know so many people who will not buy anything he has done ever again. Found Innocent in a court of law but i question his morale values.

2006-07-18 13:41:17 · answer #6 · answered by beckham_2_rooney 3 · 0 0

He was found not guilty not quite the same thing as innocent...
I wouldnt let my child within 100 yards of him, though to be honest she has seen photos and she she is scared stiff of him anyway.Actually as she is a girl she would probably be quite safe he only seems to share his bed with little boys. Funny that.

2006-07-18 13:17:16 · answer #7 · answered by Ice Queen 4 · 0 0

Perhaps we shouldn't judge good old Mike just because of his looks...To be honest, I pity him...LOL but I think that perhaps, deep inside, he's a great guy...and I think that all those disgusting stories are kinda dumb and not very believable. There are MUCH more dangerous criminals out there and NO-ONE hunts them down - people who abuse little children and then kill them and sell their body parts...It's disgusting really. So Michael Jackson...is not the one we need to accuse.
^_^

x-x-x

2006-07-18 13:16:40 · answer #8 · answered by childlikeempress 4 · 0 0

NO he molests little boys. Hello what is innocent about that?! The only reason he was found innocent is because he paid off eveyone.

2006-07-18 13:18:37 · answer #9 · answered by silverboy470 4 · 0 0

Yes. I don't think he was guilty.

But not in that I think he didn't sleep in the same bed with the kids - just that I think his mind is so warped that he didn't see that as a problem.

2006-07-18 13:33:23 · answer #10 · answered by JMoney 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers