English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Okay, I have a question and maybe I haven't thought this all through but I think it could be a good idea but maybe not because I don't have all the facts but here it is: You see all these things about stem cell research and how they want to create fetuses so they can take stem cells from them. Then you see all these commercials on tv about umbilicle cord bloodbanking so that later you can use the stem cells from it if your child gets sick and needs stem cells. So here's what I was thinking: Why don't they just take a little umbilical cord blood from the babies (who's parents give them permission to) and use it for stem cells on other people instead of creating the fetuses to take stem cells from? I dunno, maybe I'm crazy and don't have all the facts but I think that sounds like a good idea to me. Do you think it's a good idea? Would it work you think?

2006-07-18 05:58:05 · 6 answers · asked by SweetSicilian 1 in Pregnancy & Parenting Newborn & Baby

6 answers

They do that, but there is a couple problems with it. Cord stem cells taken at birth (called Adult Stem Cells) are not as powerful as embryonic stem cells. The cord stem cells can only be transplanted in the same person they came from and there is not enough of them to provide any real relief.

A good reason why embryonic stem cell research is illegal is that it would allow for a teenage girl to get pregnant on purpose for the sole intent to have an abortion and sell the embryo for LOTS of money (Almost $50k per egg at current rates). They could get pregnant again and repeat the process forever.

2006-07-18 06:12:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Its all still in the research stages. The stem cells in an umbilical cord and stem cells from fetuses are very different. Scientists just want to research all of the possibilities.

2006-07-18 06:08:45 · answer #2 · answered by Daniel L 2 · 0 0

I believe that the reason is that there is a belief that these stems cells (from the cord blood) are already processed enough so as not to be able to attain the potentiality to be used in any person, but would only be able to be used for that baby at some later stage in life.

-j.

2006-07-18 06:03:10 · answer #3 · answered by classical123 4 · 0 0

It won´t work. The convenience of making a clone and using her cells as stem cells (hence killing the fetus) is the DNA compatibility. Your body wont reject your own stem cells as they have the same DNA.

I believe the umbilical cord of the babies can be used on siblings, but with a greater chance of rejection (that makes sense, as the DNA would be made out of the same parents).

2006-07-18 06:09:01 · answer #4 · answered by dr_kant 5 · 0 0

Abortion may be criminal in spite of the indisputable fact that it is incorrect and evil and outright homicide to an innocuous unborn baby. imagine about it that child will under no circumstances see daylight hours or snort or journey a bike or delight in having acquaintances or understand the love of a figure. This unborn baby will under no circumstances understand the flaws that we take with out any interest in our primary lifes. Plus that child is torn to products in the course of the abortion it is between the procedures it truly is killed ripped limb from limb. So hence i imagine stem cellular analyze is incorrect also. after all you've already led to the unborn toddler a lot misery and soreness and brought it is existence from it so a minimum of go away their detrimental bodies on my own. Abortion and Stem cellular analyze are purely yet another one in each and every of mankind's vile and vicious and evil issues. I pray that God could have mercy on all of people that get abortions and performance had abortions. i'm happy that those detrimental toddlers will stay with him and heaven continually. i received't make it there myself who's conscious yet a minimum of they could. in order that that you understand no baby is an twist of destiny all of them come right here with a purpose yet some under no circumstances have the prospect to fulfill there purpose by using cruelty of mankind. faster or later it is going to come to bypass that we may be able to ought to account for the flaws we've finished and on condition that we are quite sorry and regretful for this stuff can we be forgiven. i understand that there are some who will see this otherwise than me consisting of atheist and human beings of non-christian or maybe some christian religions in spite of the indisputable fact that it is fantastic contained in the accurate of time it ought to come to bypass that what i believe is incorrect yet i do not care because i'm satisfied for now. properly there you've my opinion.

2016-12-01 20:37:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

JUST CUT IT

2006-07-18 06:00:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers