2006-07-18 05:31:18 · 13 answers · asked by hagar 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
First of all, I am a steelers fan so you know what I am going to say. But I try to be level headed too. I agree that the Superbowl was not the best in recent years. I was a little disappointed with the performance of both teams. I thought they both looked very nervous for most of the game. However, I don't believe you can call their victory a fluke when you consider that they beat all of the best teams in the NFL on the ROAD to get there; bengals, colts, broncos, then the seahawks. That doesn't just happen by accident. You cannot deny that the steelers played well last season, winning their last 8 or 9 games! So, no I don't think it was a fluke. I think they deserved the victory and I was happy to see them win a ring in my lifetime finally.
2006-07-18 05:38:39 · answer #1 · answered by Jimbo 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I'm not a Steelers fan, but I think they earned the victory. They beat Cincy, went into Indy and won (when most people gave the Colts the Super Bowl when they were 12-0, how foolish was that!!! Championships are not won in the regular season), beat Denver, and beat the best team in the NFC in the Seahawks. I'm not going to sit here and say it was the best played Super Bowl, but the Steelers did what they had to do, and won the championship.
2006-07-18 05:52:37 · answer #2 · answered by B-Money 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh yeah.....16 regular season games, 2 playoff games and a Super Bowl victory...sounds like a real fluke to me...c'mon, GET REAL....no team gets into the Super Bowl and WINS without earning their way....
2006-07-18 05:35:32 · answer #3 · answered by chairman_of_the_bored_04 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm a rabid Seahawks fan, yet i do not imagine they were given robbed. The officials were not undesirable sufficient to value them that pastime in the experience that that they had performed the way they did all 3 hundred and sixty 5 days, quite interior the NFC championship pastime. The Steelers did not play as well as they did in the course of the three hundred and sixty 5 days both, yet they performed a lot less badly than the Seahawks. The undesirable officiating in basic terms made the game even more suitable painful to show screen. i imagine the get lower back this 3 hundred and sixty 5 days, and that i imagine Alexander breaks the Madden curse. surely, i imagine Seattle will do a large style of issues opposite to how maximum folk view issues, because they in basic terms do issues otherwise obtainable, and individuals hardly observe.
2016-12-10 11:23:43 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What makes you ask such a stupid question? They went 15-1 last year, then go on the road for the whole playoffs to win the superbowl! Fluke? C'mon
2006-07-18 05:48:49 · answer #5 · answered by what it do 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't make me laugh...
Make them play the game again... and I bet you the out come would be the same... Pittsburgh Steelers Super Bowl Champions!!
It was NO FLUKE!!!!!!!
2006-07-18 06:33:40 · answer #6 · answered by -- 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you mean "fluke" in the sense that they don't have a chance at repeating, then yes. I don't think this team has improved at all, and with the Bus gone, they won't play with the same fire as last year.
2006-07-18 13:54:53 · answer #7 · answered by jdbreeze1 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is rumored that "the Bus" could get a ring before he retired. But who really knows the truth...
2006-07-18 05:39:04 · answer #8 · answered by Just Me 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh come on... being the number 6th seed and winning it all?
2006-07-18 10:47:23 · answer #9 · answered by arkisman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably - they wouldn't have went if they didn't beat the bengals after "accidentally" destroying Carson Palmer's leg.
2006-07-18 05:35:37 · answer #10 · answered by smm_8514 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋