By double standard I am assuming that you are referring to our handling of Israel's offensive towards Lebanon. I have to agree somewhat. It seems that the Israeli's were just waiting for an excuse to go full force or close to it in Lebanon. However, the governments of Lebanon haven't done much to curb Hezbollah's insurection activities in Israel.
2006-07-18 05:34:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Huff_Dawg 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
There IS a double standard. America would otherwise have no preference about whether the Jews or the Arabs dominated in the Middle East. Neither of them are Americans. And neither is the Middle East any part of America.
The double standard is that the US government subsidizes Israel with billions of dollars each year to buy weapons and war materiel. It does not similarly subsidize the Palestinians or the Lebanese.
The double standard is that the US government always finds excuses for Israeli aggression, while at the same time pretending that the Arabs have no good reason for the fighting that they must do.
The REASON for the double standard is that the Jews, not the Arabs, control the television networks and the syndicated press in the United States. If the Arabs had this control, instead, our country would back the Arabs and Israel's existence would not be possible.
However, no group of foreigners, Jews or Arabs, should control the American media. Only Americans should own the American media because whoever owns the press can control who the American people will hear about during elections. Whoever controls the media will decide which political and social issues will be debated and how they are presented to the people.
Because a foreign element (the Jews) have gained control of our media, they have acquired the means to control our political process. We can vote, but we can only vote for one of the names on a short list of candidates that they have approved. So no matter who wins, the winner is their man, not ours.
The Jewish takeover of the media in America, in England, and in most European countries was a deliberate move. The plan to do so was advanced at a meeting of the Alliance Israelite Universelle in Krakow (Poland) in the 19th century by Moses Montefiore, a Jew who lived in Britain and who sometimes pretended that he was an English Lord.
2006-07-18 05:44:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by David S 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no double standard. Muslims have been trying to exterminate Israel and all Jews since 1948. We don't believe in allowing genocide. If Muslims would leave Israel alone - permanently, not for a couple days - then Israel would leave Muslims alone. Israel is not trying to exterminate all Muslims. Yours is the double standard. You whine everytime Israel responds to being attacked, yet you have no problem with terrorists kidnapping and killing Israelis.
The same goes with America, by the way. Leave us alone and we'll stop going over there and kicking Muslim terrorist butt.
2006-07-18 05:35:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Farly the Seer 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
look If all of the American ppl will go out on the streets and ask the USA government to do something about Israel the government will do nothing. But a call from the Israeli lobby will do
Find out if you care
2006-07-18 05:37:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I consider you that u.s. is employing double time-honored interior the international. yet we don't probably understand what proportion human beings in Libya genuinely need to overturn Kadafi. no be counted if it is a majority, uprisings are sturdy. Is chinese language government diplomatic coverage clever? i won't be able to consider it. chinese language continuously pronounced that we could desire to continuously no longer use protection stress intervene against different united states of america particularly of multilateral negotiations. genuinely everyone only knows of that that may not gonna artwork. I nonetheless bear in mind that chinese language media saved attacking US before Bush administration released the conflict on Iraq. you may think of that each Iraqi supported Saddam with the aid of observing CCTV. yet only one or 2 days after the conflict broke out, CCTV completely replaced its stance. It replace into pronounced that many Iraqis toppled the statue of Saddam and danced around it. It replace into somewhat awkward. yet another occasion is that China continues to be publicly helping North Korea, although each chinese language knows of that Kim Jong Il is an asshole and awful dictator. yet, China somewhat shouldn't lend additional funds to US and end paying for extra US funds. US is only producing further and extra funds, which make the money extra much less costly and extra much less costly. chinese language government could desire to apply the money they earned those years to develop the residing time-honored and welfare of chinese language human beings.
2016-11-02 07:00:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by aguas 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because life is more complicated than a one sentence question.
2006-07-18 05:33:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by claymore 3
·
0⤊
0⤋