English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Dont you think it is stupid dat Israel attacked first and Bush said dat Israel has every right to defend itself?

2006-07-18 05:21:05 · 7 answers · asked by PFX 3 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

7 answers

Israel can commit any act of aggression, and the US government and the Jewish media that control the US government will always find some excuse or other.

There IS a double standard. America would otherwise have no preference about whether the Jews or the Arabs dominated in the Middle East. Neither of them are Americans. And neither is the Middle East any part of America.

The double standard is that the US government subsidizes Israel with billions of dollars each year to buy weapons and war materiel. It does not similarly subsidize the Palestinians or the Lebanese.

The double standard is that the US government always finds excuses for Israeli aggression, while at the same time pretending that the Arabs have no good reason for the fighting that they must do.

The REASON for the double standard is that the Jews, not the Arabs, control the television networks and the syndicated press in the United States. If the Arabs had this control, instead, our country would back the Arabs and Israel's existence would not be possible.

However, no group of foreigners, Jews or Arabs, should control the American media. Only Americans should own the American media because whoever owns the press can control who the American people will hear about during elections. Whoever controls the media will decide which political and social issues will be debated and how they are presented to the people.

Because a foreign element (the Jews) have gained control of our media, they have acquired the means to control our political process. We can vote, but we can only vote for one of the names on a short list of candidates that they have approved. So no matter who wins, the winner is their man, not ours.

The Jewish takeover of the media in America, in England, and in most European countries was a deliberate move. The plan to do so was advanced at a meeting of the Alliance Israelite Universelle in Krakow (Poland) in the 19th century by Moses Montefiore, a Jew who lived in Britain and who sometimes pretended that he was an English Lord.

2006-07-18 06:07:11 · answer #1 · answered by David S 5 · 2 2

A war consists of the acts of two or more sides. Each side is responsible for its own acts. Israel is responsible for what it does; Hezbolla is responsible for what it does.

You do seem to have the sequence of events mixed up, but ultimately it doesn't really matter.

2006-07-18 05:51:21 · answer #2 · answered by A B 3 · 0 0

Hezbollah captures 2 Israeli soldiers on the border. Israel attacked, however, it did overreact, so far killing over 200 lebanese civilians, wounding over 700. To me, this is not self-defence, this is close to a massacre. Unfortunatly many Israeli's and Americans are blinded and brainwashed by their media, turning them into heartless racists.

2006-07-18 05:38:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think Bushy and Israel on in on this together.
Don't know why as yet but it will become apparent later.
Something to do with oil or strategic position and of course Cheney's will be protected when Halliburten goes in to rebuild.

2006-07-18 08:38:18 · answer #4 · answered by Lou 6 · 0 0

seems like lebanon attacked first and i support Israel in responding

2006-07-18 05:26:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Israel, Iran, Syria, Lebanon ... they are all part of the problem.

2006-07-18 05:26:52 · answer #6 · answered by carl l 6 · 0 0

Yeah, it is.
None of Israel's actions are really justifiable...

2006-07-18 05:35:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers