It's regarding John Doe confidential informants and Franks v. Delaware motion. A judge denied a motion to supress evidence using a franks motion because he says the John Doe has to be a agent of the government. My lawyer says he is wrong but has not found anything to support this. I need to find something to prove this wrong. Thank you very much in advance for any information you might have.
2006-07-18 04:57:22 · 7 answers · asked by ~~~J~~~ 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Try asking Bill Handel on http://www.handleonthelaw.com/. There is a "Questions 4 Bill" link at the top. He does a legal radio show in California on Saturdays.
2006-07-18 06:11:04 · answer #1 · answered by soohoo145 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I did a search and brought up nothing, but perhaps you can contact a law school and get some answers and reference information from perhaps a senior student or one of the staff? Best I could do. Sorry......
2006-07-18 05:05:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Forums that discuss legal issues abound on the Internet, but don't expect anyone like an attorney to give you legal advice. For example, here's one link for bankruptcy:
http://www.bankruptcyforum.com/index.php?
2006-07-18 05:03:15 · answer #3 · answered by What I Say 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can ask on a lot of places. They'll charge you for the answer, though.
2006-07-18 05:02:13 · answer #4 · answered by ninusharra 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Try google searcch
2006-07-18 05:12:18 · answer #5 · answered by openpsychy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
plenty of places
2006-07-18 05:06:20 · answer #6 · answered by idontkno 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
try nolo law
2006-07-18 05:00:41 · answer #7 · answered by Birdlegs 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋